Retail (non-fashion)·New York City, United States·Founded 1837

Tiffany & Co. sustainability score: 52/100

Tiffany & Co. is a US-based luxury jewelry retailer founded in 1837, headquartered in New York City.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

52/100
Making progress-3 since last review
Joint 1st of 48 in Retail (non-fashion)
Pending reviewMixed evidence· 10 src

Tiffany has credible absolute emission reductions and SBTi-validated net-zero targets, but supply chain opacity remains severe. Mining-linked Scope 3 emissions dominate its footprint with only 13% of suppliers committed to climate targets. Water data is entirely absent, biodiversity risk is unquantified, and third-party verification gaps persist despite consistent annual reporting.

Tiffany & Co. scores 52/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.

That places Tiffany & Co. joint 105th of 847 companies scored, and joint 1st of 48 in Retail (non-fashion).

At a glance

Tiffany & Co.'s strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Its climate targets8/10
  • How clean its energy is7/10
Weakest
  • Its effect on water3/10
  • Emissions from its supply chain5/10
See all ten questions ↓
Tiffany & Co. in context

How does Tiffany & Co. compare with other retail (non-fashion) companies?

Tiffany & Co. shares top spot among retail (non-fashion) peers.

Among the 48 major retail (non-fashion) brands we've scored, Tiffany & Co. is tied =1st of 48, with 2 others.

=1/48
Tiffany & Co.'s rank
38
Industry average
18
Industry low
52
Industry high
See all 48 in Retail (non-fashion) →
What would raise this score

Where Tiffany & Co. lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Its effect on water3/10

    No water consumption data, footprint quantification, or reduction targets disclosed in FY2022–2024 sources.

  2. Emissions from its supply chain5/10

    Only 13% of key suppliers committed to public climate targets.

  3. Its effect on nature5/10

    No TNFD disclosure, quantified biodiversity footprint, or deforestation-free supply chain commitment.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Tiffany &

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Tiffany & Co. doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Targets & Commitments and Energy Source (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (3/10, 5/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 10 sources.

About Tiffany & Co.

Tiffany & Co. is a US-based luxury jewelry retailer founded in 1837, headquartered in New York City. The company designs, manufactures, and retails fine jewelry, diamonds, and watches globally. It operates manufacturing facilities for diamond polishing and jewelry production alongside a network of retail stores and e-commerce channels.

Founded
1837
Headquarters
New York City, United States
Employees
~14,000
Annual revenue
~$4.2B
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.