Just Eat Takeaway reports carbon data inconsistently—Scope 3 appeared in 2024 but not 2023—and relies on intensity targets rather than absolute emissions cuts, a greenwashing hallmark. The company has virtually no biodiversity or water strategy despite operating a food delivery platform across 17 countries. Governance exists but lacks third-party verification and SBTi alignment.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Carbon Footprint — Operations (7/10, 6/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (1/10, 1/10).
7 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 14 major e-commerce / online retail brands we've scored, Just Eat Takeaway.com sits 11th of 14.
Score history begins 4 April 2026.
As Just Eat Takeaway.com's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Just Eat Takeaway is a Netherlands-based online food delivery marketplace connecting consumers to restaurants across 17 markets. The company operates as a platform intermediary, generating revenue through commissions and advertising rather than direct fulfillment. It competes with Deliveroo and Uber Eats in the fragmented food delivery sector.
Direct competitor in food delivery; similar platform scale but stronger packaging commitment reported.
View breakdown →Cross-sector platform play; Uber Eats competes in same delivery market with comparable ESG maturity.
View breakdown →Large food system player; both have significant Scope 3 emissions via supply chain, neither has robust nature strategy.
View breakdown →Comparable size and multi-market operations; Unilever has stronger biodiversity and water disclosures.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.