Oil & Gas·Houston, Texas, United States·Founded 2011

Phillips 66 sustainability score: 17/100

Phillips 66 is a US refining, midstream, chemicals and marketing company headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

17/100
Pending reviewStrong evidence· 16 src

Phillips 66's Scope 1 and 2 emissions rose about 13% between 2019 and 2024, to 40.2 Mt, while its targets cover only intensity. Its use-of-products Scope 3 is 365 Mt, and it reports no self-generated renewable energy; its one solar site at Rodeo is owned by NextEra. It paid an $8 million penalty under a January 2026 deferred prosecution agreement (not a conviction) over Clean Water Act charges, and LobbyMap grades it D- for its role in groups opposing US climate policy.

Phillips 66 scores 17/100 (Significant gaps) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified October 2026.

That places Phillips 66 joint 828th of 847 companies scored, and joint 10th of 16 in Oil & Gas.

At a glance

Phillips 66's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Emissions from its own operations7/10
  • How openly it reports7/10
Weakest
  • Whether its emissions are falling1/10
  • How clean its energy is1/10
See all ten questions ↓
Phillips 66 in context

How does Phillips 66 compare with other oil & gas companies?

Where Phillips 66 sits among oil & gas peers.

Among the 16 major oil & gas brands we've scored, Phillips 66 is tied =10th of 16, with 3 others.

=10/16
Phillips 66's rank
18
Industry average
12
Industry low
24
Industry high
See all 16 in Oil & Gas →
What would raise this score

Where Phillips 66 lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Whether its emissions are falling1/10

    Intensity fell 15%, but this does not offset absolute growth.

  2. How clean its energy is1/10

    The only documented renewable is a 30.2 MW solar facility at Rodeo (NextEra-owned) avoiding ~33,000 tCO2/year, under 0.1% of 2024 emissions.

  3. Its effect on nature2/10

    Phillips 66 reports no biodiversity performance indicators and answered 'data not available' on protected-area exposure, though states 12% of pipelines are near ecologically sensitive areas.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Phillips 66

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Phillips 66 doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Transparency & Accountability (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Energy Source (1/10, 1/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 16 sources.

About Phillips 66

Phillips 66 is a US refining, midstream, chemicals and marketing company headquartered in Houston, Texas. It was incorporated in 2011 ahead of its separation from ConocoPhillips. It had about 12,600 employees and $136.6 billion in FY2025 revenue.

Founded
2011
Headquarters
Houston, Texas, United States
Employees
~12,600 (FY2025)
Annual revenue
$136,560M total revenues and other income (FY2025)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.