Carbon Footprint — Operations: How does Royal Philips score?

Philips Annual Report 2024 (published February 2025) discloses Scope 1 emissions of 17,783 tCO₂e and Scope 2 market-based emissions of 2,179 tCO₂e (location-based: 157,610 tCO₂e). Total operational GHG was 175,393 tCO₂e (Scope 1+2 location-based), a 5.81% increase year-on-year. GHG Protocol methodology is applied, with published emission accounting methodology documents. The company has disclosed Scope 1 and 2 data annually for over a decade, holds CDP Climate Change A-list status for 11 consecu

Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain: How does Royal Philips score?

Philips reports Scope 3 emissions of 4,378,443 tCO₂e for 2024, covering 5 of 15 GHG Protocol categories (notably categories 1, 4, 9, and 11 — use of sold products represents ~57.75% of Scope 3 total). The company became the first health technology company to have SBTi-validated Scope 3 targets in January 2023, targeting a 42% reduction in value-chain CO₂ by 2030 vs. 2020 baseline of 7,360,235 tCO₂e. Supplier engagement is active: 48% of procurement by spend from suppliers with SBTi-aligned targe

Emissions Trajectory: How does Royal Philips score?

Total reported emissions fell 11.39% in 2024 versus 2023, from approximately 5.14Mt to 4.55Mt tCO₂e. Scope 1 decreased 10.44% year-on-year in 2024, and Scope 3 decreased 11.96%. However, total Scope 3 remains 537% higher than 2018 (partly attributable to expanded methodology) and operational Scope 1+2 rose 5.81% year-on-year in 2024, which is an adverse trend on the operations side. Philips is reported as ahead of schedule on its operational reduction target (94.58% of planned reduction achieved

Energy Source: How does Royal Philips score?

In 2024, Philips sourced 80% of its total energy from renewable sources, exceeding its own 75% target. Renewable electricity is secured through consortium-led long-term Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) — including wind farms in Finland (Mutkalampi), Italy (agrivoltaic), the US (Hidalgo Wind Farm, Texas), and a fishery-solar plant in China — as well as Energy Attribute Certificates (EACs). Philips is an RE100 member with a historical commitment to 100% renewable electricity. The reliance on unbun

Nature & Biodiversity Impact: How does Royal Philips score?

Philips has published TNFD-aligned disclosures (2023 TNFD report covering 23 manufacturing sites across 10 countries) and a GRI Biodiversity table, using the WWF Biodiversity Risk Filter and GLOBIO tools. The EP&L includes biodiversity impact monetisation. The company acknowledges nature-related risks and monitors ecosystem conditions at key sites annually. Philips is a medical device and electronics manufacturer — not in a high-risk primary nature sector — but its supply chain involves mining f

Resource Use & Waste: How does Royal Philips score?

Philips achieved 24% circular revenue in 2024 (up from 20% in 2023 and 18% in 2022), against a 25% by 2025 target. All new product introductions (NPIs) were 100% EcoDesigned in 2024 for the first time — the framework addresses energy efficiency, hazardous substance avoidance, material optimisation and packaging. The company operates takeback programmes in European markets for electric toothbrushes and shavers (Refurb Edition). An Environmental Profit & Loss statement covers waste and materials a

Water Impact: How does Royal Philips score?

Philips was awarded a CDP double A-list score for climate change and water security in December 2022 (one of only 15 European companies), and this water security A-list designation reflects comprehensive water monitoring and stewardship at the time of scoring. The company's EP&L monetises water consumption as a category of environmental impact. The 2023 TNFD report identifies water consumption dependencies at Netherlands manufacturing sites and assesses water risks via the WRI Aqueduct tool. Phi

Targets & Commitments: How does Royal Philips score?

Philips holds SBTi near-term validated targets (Scope 1+2: -75% by 2025 and -90% by 2040 vs. 2015 baseline; Scope 3: -42% by 2030 vs. 2020 baseline) and a net-zero SBTi-validated target by 2045. These are absolute reduction targets, not intensity-based. All three scopes covered. As of 2024, Philips is ahead of schedule on operational targets (94.58% of planned reduction achieved). Offsets are used to cover the operational carbon footprint — in 2024 this equated to the annual uptake of approximat

Transparency & Accountability: How does Royal Philips score?

Philips has published annual sustainability/ESG reports since 2008 and has now aligned to the EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) in its 2024 Annual Report (published February 2025). The company holds a dedicated SVP and Global Head of Sustainability (Robert Metzke) and a Chief ESG & Legal Officer on the Board of Management (Marnix van Ginneken), indicating board-level governance. CDP A-list for climate for 11 consecutive years and water security double A-list. TCFD, TNFD, G

Controversies & Red Flags: How does Royal Philips score?

Starting at 8: The Philips Respironics CPAP/BiPAP/ventilator recall (initiated June 2021) remains the dominant controversy. The FDA issued a Class I recall (most serious level) in 2023 for replacement devices. Philips reached a $479 million economic loss class action settlement (September 2023) and a $1.1 billion personal injury settlement (April 2024). A consent decree was agreed with the US DOJ/FDA in 2024, restricting Respironics operations. An SEC subpoena was received in March 2024 regardin

Royal Philips Sustainability Score: 56/100

Recently scored: Dentsu, Omnicom, Publicis Groupe, WPP

507 companies scored·4 score updates this week

Royal Philips·Healthcare / Pharmaceuticals·Amsterdam, Netherlands·Founded 1891·Last verified 25 April 2026

out of 100

Making progressPending Review

Philips has built comprehensive climate governance with SBTi-validated targets, 80% renewable energy, and 11 consecutive CDP A-list ratings. However, a decade-long CPAP recall with 561 FDA-reported deaths, $1.1 billion settlement, and ongoing SEC scrutiny exposes systemic product safety failure that overshadows sustainability credentials.

No challenges currently filed

The calculation

Every score shows its working.

Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale

Industry base impact

Healthcare / Pharmaceuticals sector ceiling.

45 / 100

Performance score

Sum of the 10 rubric questions, scored 0–10 each.

65 / 100

Raw score

Weighted average before scale penalty.

(0.3 × 45) + (0.7 × 65) = 59.0

Scale penalty

Multiplier based on absolute emissions volume — physics-first.

× 0.95

Final score

Rounded. Making progress.

56 / 100

The ten questions

Where Royal Philips is strong, and where it isn't.

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Transparency & Accountability (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (4/10, 5/10).

Where the evidence comes from

Every document used, listed.

19 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.

[1]Third-party verified

Tracenable—Koninklijke Philips GHG Emissions Dashboard

Ongoing

Q1Q2Q3

Every score shows its working.

Where Royal Philips is strong, and where it isn't.

Every document used, listed.

Royal Philips is the highest-scoring healthcare / pharmaceuticals company we've rated.

Royal Philips's score over time.

This score is not currently being contested.

Related companies worth a look.

We'll let you know when the score moves.

Which companies moved this week, and why.