Smiths sustainability score: 48/100

·Industrial Equipment / Machinery·London, United Kingdom·Founded 1851·Last verified 29 August 2026
48
out of 100
Making progressPending ReviewMixed evidence· 12 src

Smiths scores 48/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment — scored from public data only, no company payment can change a number. Last verified August 2026.

That places Smiths joint 129th of 650 companies scored, and 1st of 7 in Industrial Equipment / Machinery.

Smiths has demonstrated consistent absolute emissions reductions across operations and supply chain, with SBTi-validated net-zero targets and executive pay tied to GHG outcomes. Major weaknesses: supplier engagement is nascent (9% SBTi-aligned), biodiversity work remains at assessment stage, and circularity is concentrated in one division.

Is this your company?

This score is built from public data only. If your practice is stronger than your disclosure, submit evidence for review — or challenge any question, free.

Enhanced Assessment — £99
The calculation

How is Smiths's SINK score calculated?

Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale
Industry base impact
Industrial Equipment / Machinery sector ceiling.
44 / 100
Performance score
Sum of the 10 rubric questions, scored 0–10 each.
64 / 100
Raw score
Weighted average before scale penalty.
(0.3 × 44) + (0.7 × 64) = 58.0
Scale penalty
Multiplier based on absolute emissions volume — physics-first.
× 0.82
Final score
Rounded. Making progress.
48 / 100
The ten questions

What is Smiths doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Targets & Commitments (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Water Impact (4/10, 5/10).

Where the evidence comes from

What evidence is Smiths's score based on?

12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.

[1]Self-reported
ESG Metrics, Targets and Disclosures

Total energy consumption MWh 215,027 [FY2024]; Total renewable energy consumption used for electricity 73%

2024
Q1Q4
View →
[2]Self-reported
Emissions Inventory and Assurance

KPMG LLP were engaged by Smiths... Both the FY2024 and FY2025 data presented in this report uses Watershed global standard methodology.

Ongoing
Q1Q9
View →
[3]Public record
Smiths Group releases 2024 Sustainability Report (Investegate RNS)

delivered strong progress in operational GHG emissions reduction (10.7%) and energy efficiency (4.5%)

2024
Q1Q5Q7
View →
[4]Third-party verified
Smiths Group Reports 15% Year-on-Year Reduction in GHG Emissions

total carbon footprint of 1,210,759 tonnes of CO2 equivalent for the year to July 2024 – down from 1,430,058 tonnes the previous year

2024
Q2Q3
View →
[5]Self-reported
Smiths Group Receives SBTi Validation for Net Zero Targets

Smiths delivered an 8% year-on-year improvement in energy efficiency, a 12% reduction in absolute Scope 1 & 2 emissions, and a 5% reduction in Scope 3 emissions.

2024
Q3Q8
View →
[6]Self-reported
Smiths Sustainability Report 2024

15–20% reduction by FY2027 within a framework to cap the use of renewable energy certificates (RECs)

2024
Q4Q8
View →
[7]Self-reported
Smiths Detection's Recycling and Refurbishment Programme Reduces Emissions

more than 9,000 reworked parts return to active service, which represents savings of 1,137 tonnes of CO2e Scope 3 emissions – a 22% increase on FY2023

2024
Q6
View →
[8]Self-reported
Smiths Group Publishes 2024 Sustainability at Smiths Report

Smiths is targeting 30 biodiversity projects, 30 water saving projects, and 30 waste/circularity projects for completion in this period.

2024
Q6Q7
View →
[9]Self-reported
Smiths Environmental Standards

we have also reduced total water use by 44% and non-recyclable waste by 49%

Ongoing
Q7
View →
[10]Self-reported
Smiths Annual Report 2025

have chosen to retire the Innovation, Sustainability & Excellence Committee and elevate its sustainability and innovation responsibilities to the main Board

2025
Q9Q10
View →
[11]Third-party verified
InfluenceMap

InfluenceMap maintains the world's leading database of corporate and industry association lobbying of climate policy around the globe.

Ongoing
Q10
View →
[12]Third-party verified
SBTi Target Dashboard

The SBTi's Target Dashboard lists companies and financial institutions that have set science-based targets, or have committed to developing targets.

Ongoing
Q8
View →

If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.

Smiths in context

How does Smiths compare with other industrial equipment / machinery companies?

Smiths is the highest-scoring industrial equipment / machinery company we've rated.

Among the 7 major industrial equipment / machinery brands we've scored, Smiths sits 1st of 7.

1/7
Smiths's rank
38
Industry average
31
Industry low
48
Industry high
How this score has moved

Has Smiths's score changed?

today

Score history begins .

As Smiths's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.

We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.

What's being contested

Has Smiths's score been challenged?

This score is not currently being contested.

Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.

No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.

About Smiths

Smiths Group is a UK-listed industrial equipment manufacturer founded in 1851, headquartered in London. With 23,250 employees, it operates across precision engineering, aerospace, detection systems, and thermal solutions. The company serves aerospace, defence, and industrial markets globally.

Founded
1851
Headquarters
London, United Kingdom
Employees
~23,250
Annual revenue
~£3.0B
Company website ↗
Track Smiths

We'll let you know when the score moves.

Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.

THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

HOW SINK STAYS INDEPENDENT

Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.