BMW scores 6 points higher than Mercedes-Benz on SINK's sustainability index.
BMW is more sustainable according to SINK's open sustainability index, scoring 35/100 vs Mercedes-Benz's 29/100 — a difference of 6 points.
BMW scores 35/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Below expectations). BMW reports transparent operational emissions and renewable electricity sourcing but relies on intensity-based targets that obscure absolute reduction obligations. Critical weaknesses: cartel liability, misleading advertising bans, aggressive lobbying against EU climate rules, and absent nature/biodiversity assessment despite high-risk supply chain exposure.
Mercedes-Benz scores 29/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Significant gaps). Mercedes-Benz reports declining absolute emissions despite cherry-picked intensity targets and renewable energy gains. Its intensity-based Scope 3 commitment allows total emissions to rise with sales. The CEO abandoned the all-electric-by-2030 pledge in 2024. Lobbying misalignment with Paris Agreement and a C-grade from InfluenceMap undermine climate credibility.
Both companies are rated on the same 10-question SINK rubric: Scope 1/2/3 carbon footprint, energy source, nature and biodiversity, resource use, water, emissions trajectory, science-based targets, transparency, and controversies. Scores are 0–100, based on public data, and fully reproducible.
See the full leaderboard — 500+ companies ranked.
View full leaderboard →