SaaS / Digital Services·Paoli, United States·Founded 2008

DuckDuckGo sustainability score: 49/100

DuckDuckGo is a privacy-focused search engine founded in 2008, headquartered in Paoli, Pennsylvania.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewThin evidence· 3 src

DuckDuckGo's environmental footprint is negligible by design—fully distributed, no owned infrastructure, minimal operational emissions under 1,000 tCO₂e annually. The company's 2021 carbon-negative claim rests entirely on offsets, not operational reduction. Post-2022 disclosure has stopped: no updated emissions data, no formal Scope 3 reporting, no governance structure, and no third-party verification.

DuckDuckGo scores 49/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified July 2026.

That places DuckDuckGo joint 169th of 847 companies scored, and joint 22nd of 76 in SaaS / Digital Services.

At a glance

DuckDuckGo's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Its record on controversies8/10
  • Its effect on water5/10
Weakest
  • Whether its emissions are falling2/10
  • Emissions from its own operations3/10
See all ten questions ↓
DuckDuckGo in context

How does DuckDuckGo compare with other saas / digital services companies?

Where DuckDuckGo sits among saas / digital services peers.

Among the 76 major saas / digital services brands we've scored, DuckDuckGo is tied =22nd of 76, with 1 other.

=22/76
DuckDuckGo's rank
42
Industry average
25
Industry low
71
Industry high
See all 76 in SaaS / Digital Services →
What would raise this score

Where DuckDuckGo lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Whether its emissions are falling2/10

    Only single 2019 baseline available (1,075 tCO₂e).

  2. Emissions from its own operations3/10

    No formal Scope 1/2 GHG Protocol disclosure published since 2022.

  3. Emissions from its supply chain3/10

    No formal Scope 3 quantification under GHG Protocol categories published since 2022.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For DuckDuckGo

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is DuckDuckGo doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Water Impact (8/10, 5/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Carbon Footprint — Operations (2/10, 3/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 3 sources.

About DuckDuckGo

DuckDuckGo is a privacy-focused search engine founded in 2008, headquartered in Paoli, Pennsylvania. The company syndicates search results from third-party infrastructure (primarily Bing/Microsoft), operates fully distributed with no owned offices, and serves millions of users seeking search without tracking. It competes with Google and other mainstream search engines on privacy rather than advertising reach.

Founded
2008
Headquarters
Paoli, United States
Employees
~200-335
Annual revenue
~$100M (estimate; aggregator, unverified)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.