Healthcare / Pharmaceuticals·Irving, Texas, United States·Founded 1994

McKesson sustainability score: 33/100

McKesson is a US pharmaceutical and medical-supply distributor headquartered in Irving, Texas, sitting between drug manufacturers and pharmacies, hospitals and clinics.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewMixed evidence· 11 src

McKesson's Scope 1 and 2 emissions are falling with Deloitte assurance, but its stated Scope 3, about 99% of its footprint, rose 38% from FY2020 to 35.2 Mt in FY2026. It has SBTi-approved near-term targets but no net-zero target, no biodiversity or nature-risk disclosure, and no water target although about 91% of its water is drawn in water-stressed states. It is a liable party at 12 Superfund sites.

McKesson scores 33/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified October 2026.

That places McKesson joint 539th of 847 companies scored, and joint 18th of 19 in Healthcare / Pharmaceuticals.

At a glance

McKesson's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Emissions from its own operations8/10
  • Emissions from its supply chain7/10
Weakest
  • Its effect on nature2/10
  • Whether its emissions are falling3/10
See all ten questions ↓
McKesson in context

How does McKesson compare with other healthcare / pharmaceuticals companies?

McKesson is tied at the bottom of the healthcare / pharmaceuticals pack.

Among the 19 major healthcare / pharmaceuticals brands we've scored, McKesson is tied =18th of 19, with 1 other.

=18/19
McKesson's rank
44
Industry average
33
Industry low
53
Industry high
See all 19 in Healthcare / Pharmaceuticals →
What would raise this score

Where McKesson lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Its effect on nature2/10

    Operations are distribution centers and offices under Green Building Standards for water, energy, waste only.

  2. Whether its emissions are falling3/10

    Company claims 72% progress toward near-term target but dominant scope remains well above baseline.

  3. Its effect on water3/10

    No multi-year trend, reduction target or discharge data.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For McKesson

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is McKesson doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Emissions Trajectory (2/10, 3/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 11 sources.

About McKesson

McKesson is a US pharmaceutical and medical-supply distributor headquartered in Irving, Texas, sitting between drug manufacturers and pharmacies, hospitals and clinics. Incorporated in Delaware in 1994, it had about 43,000 employees and $403.4 billion in FY2026 revenue.

Founded
1994
Headquarters
Irving, Texas, United States
Employees
~43,000 (FY2026)
Annual revenue
$403,430M revenues (FY2026)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.