Construction / Real Estate·Letchworth Garden City, United Kingdom·Founded 1924

Willmott Dixon sustainability score: 54/100

Willmott Dixon is a privately owned UK construction and building services firm, with roots going back to 1852, headquartered in Letchworth Garden City.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewStrong evidence· 12 src

Willmott Dixon has cut operational emissions 63% since 2018 and hit 84% renewable electricity by 2025, backed by SBTi 1.5°C targets and Bureau Veritas assurance. Scope 3 dominates total footprint and rose in 2025 despite absolute operational gains. Supply chain emissions rely on spend-based proxies, not physical material data; nature and timber sourcing remain unquantified.

Willmott Dixon scores 54/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified October 2026.

That places Willmott Dixon joint 64th of 847 companies scored, and joint 2nd of 26 in Construction / Real Estate.

At a glance

Willmott Dixon's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Emissions from its own operations8/10
  • How openly it reports8/10
Weakest
  • Whether its emissions are falling4/10
  • Its effect on nature5/10
See all ten questions ↓
Willmott Dixon in context

How does Willmott Dixon compare with other construction / real estate companies?

Where Willmott Dixon sits among construction / real estate peers.

Among the 26 major construction / real estate brands we've scored, Willmott Dixon is tied =2nd of 26, with 1 other.

=2/26
Willmott Dixon's rank
41
Industry average
27
Industry low
60
Industry high
See all 26 in Construction / Real Estate →
What would raise this score

Where Willmott Dixon lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Whether its emissions are falling4/10

    Series is spend-based; absolute Scope 3 reduction not demonstrated.

  2. Its effect on nature5/10

    No TNFD disclosure, quantified nature footprint, or timber and aggregate sourcing assessment found.

  3. How clean its energy is6/10

    The full reasoning is in the ten questions below.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Willmott Dixon

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Willmott Dixon doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Transparency & Accountability (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (4/10, 5/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 12 sources.

About Willmott Dixon

Willmott Dixon is a privately owned UK construction and building services firm, with roots going back to 1852, headquartered in Letchworth Garden City. It operates across education, healthcare, commercial and infrastructure sectors, employing approximately 1,919 staff and generating £1.1bn revenue in 2025.

Founded
1924
Headquarters
Letchworth Garden City, United Kingdom
Employees
~1,919
Annual revenue
£1,113.2M (FY2025)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.