Ford Motor Company scores 5 points higher than General Motors on SINK's sustainability index.
Ford Motor Company is more sustainable according to SINK's open sustainability index, scoring 30/100 vs General Motors's 25/100 — a difference of 5 points.
Ford Motor Company scores 30/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Significant gaps). Ford reports verified operational emissions cuts of 49% since 2017 and targets SBTi-validated reductions, but Scope 3 dominates at 361 Mt CO2e—driven entirely by ICE vehicle use—with only intensity-based targets that allow absolute growth. Supply chain disclosure lags biodiversity risk assessment, and trade association lobbying undermines climate policy alignment.
General Motors scores 25/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Significant gaps). GM's sustainability record is dominated by rising absolute emissions despite operational improvements. Scope 3 emissions—99% of its footprint—grew 11.7% in 2024, driven by a fleet still 69-72% trucks and SUVs. The company departed SBTi validation in 2024, faced a $145.8M EPA fine for emissions cheating on 5.9M vehicles, and lobbies against clean vehicle standards while greenwashing renewable energy claims.
Both companies are rated on the same 10-question SINK rubric: Scope 1/2/3 carbon footprint, energy source, nature and biodiversity, resource use, water, emissions trajectory, science-based targets, transparency, and controversies. Scores are 0–100, based on public data, and fully reproducible.
See the full leaderboard — 500+ companies ranked.
View full leaderboard →