GM's 29/100 score reflects a company that publishes sustainability data while failing on the metrics that matter most: absolute emissions are rising, scope 3 intensity targets are unmet, and the company lobbies against climate policy. An EPA settlement for systematic emissions underreporting and continued dominance of high-emission trucks expose the gap between stated commitments and actual performance.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Energy Source (7/10, 6/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Controversies & Red Flags (2/10, 3/10).
16 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 24 major automotive brands we've scored, General Motors sits 13th of 24.
Score history begins 8 February 2026.
As General Motors's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
General Motors is a US-based automotive manufacturer producing ~6 million vehicles annually, dominated by internal combustion engine trucks and SUVs (~69-72% of fleet). The company competes in a sector undergoing forced electrification, holding a middle-tier position in EV rollout against Tesla and legacy competitors like Ford and Volkswagen.
Legacy US automaker with similar EV transition challenges and fuel-efficiency compliance risks
View breakdown →European peer advancing EV transition faster; faced own emissions scandal; stronger EU regulatory compliance
View breakdown →EV-native competitor with zero compliance controversies; industry baseline for emissions performance leadership
View breakdown →Japanese incumbent balancing hybrid/EV strategy; SBTi validation retained; more conservative but stable targets
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.