Ferrari makes luxury performance sports cars at Maranello, Italy; cars and spare parts made up 84.0% and sponsorship, commercial and brand activities 11.5% of its net revenues in 2025. Ferrari N.V. was incorporated in the Netherlands in 2015; its roots go back to 1939.
More about Ferrari
Exor holds about 21.33 percent of its shares. It employed an average of 5,544 people in 2025 and had net revenues of about €7.15 billion.
Founded 2015Head office Maranello, ItalyStaff ~5,544 average (2025); 5,718 at 31 December 2025Revenue ~€7.15B net revenues (2025)Website ↗
Ferrari's footprint was 966,413 tCO2e in 2025, down from 1,033,118 tCO2e in 2024, but emissions from its cars in use rose 10%, on official test figures that real-world data suggest understate fuel use. 48% of its energy came from renewable sources, and its purchased renewable electricity is 99.8% backed by guarantees of origin. Its 2030 targets are self-set and not SBTi-validated, and it halved its 2030 EV share target from 40% to 20%. It states it has no transition plan and publishes no water figures. LobbyMap records it advocating weaker emissions standards in the EU, US and Australia. No upheld environmental fine was found.
Ferrari scores 40/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified November 2026.
That places Ferrari joint 422nd of 986 companies scored, and joint 2nd of 36 in Automotive.
What is Ferrari doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Carbon Footprint: Operations and Transparency & Accountability (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (1/10, 2/10).
Where Ferrari lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
- Emissions from its own operations8/10No verified figures published with their method and a falling trend.
- Emissions from its supply chain6/10No full value-chain map or supplier engagement programme.
- Whether its emissions are falling5/10No evidence of a year-on-year fall in its total emissions.
- How clean its energy is6/10Less than 90% of its energy shown to be renewable.
- Its effect on nature2/10No assessment of its effect on nature, and no basic environmental policy.
- How it uses materials and handles waste4/10No measurable waste or recycling targets reported publicly.
- Its effect on water3/10No monitoring of water use, or no measures to reduce it.
- Its climate targets3/10No specific targets with dates.
- How openly it reports7/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
- Its record on controversies1/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Ferrari's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is Ferrari's score based on?
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
17% of them were published by Ferrari itself; the rest come from independent sources.
10 of 12 sources are independent of the company.
“Total Scope 1 emissions 38,618 65,338”
“viene comunicata la dismissione dell’impianto di trigenerazione”
“Its 296 GTB and SF90 Stradale / Spider used a terrifying 20.06 l/100 km of fuel on average”
“Shell to provide the iconic Italian sports car manufacturer with 650 GWh of renewable energy”
“help reduce its methane gas consumption by 70% and slash its annual scope 1 and scope 2 emissions by 60%”
“the company has advocated to weaken emissions standards in the EU, the US, and Australia, and retains memberships to negatively engaged industry associations”
“This decision is very interesting for us because it allows ICEs to go beyond 2036”
“Ferrari has announced that it has halved its target for EV shipments from 2030 to 20 per cent”
“it has now cut its EV sales forecast to 20 percent”
“con portata massima di prelievo di 5 l/s e volume annuo non superiore a 15.000 mc”
“treat and reintroduce 60% of water from our production processes”
“The company announced it would slash its fully electric model mix target from 40 % to 20 % by 2030”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Ferrari compare with other automotive companies?
Where Ferrari sits among automotive peers.
Among the 36 major automotive brands we've scored, Ferrari is tied =2nd of 36, with 1 other.
Who scores higher in Automotive?
The one company in the sector scoring above Ferrari.
See the full Automotive table →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.