Financial Services / Banking·London, United Kingdom·Founded 2007

Jupiter Fund Management sustainability score: 33/100

Jupiter Fund Management is a UK-based active asset manager, with roots going back to 1985, with £465.7M revenue (FY2025) and ~468 staff.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewMixed evidence· 10 src

Jupiter's financed emissions rose 48% year-on-year to 26.2 MtCO2e while operational emissions fell marginally. Its net-zero 2050 commitment lacks validation; portfolio targets are under review. Disclosure is voluminous but contains unresolved contradictions and unassured figures.

Jupiter Fund Management scores 33/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified October 2026.

That places Jupiter Fund Management joint 539th of 847 companies scored, and joint 31st of 51 in Financial Services / Banking.

At a glance

Jupiter Fund Management's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Emissions from its own operations8/10
  • How clean its energy is6/10
Weakest
  • Whether its emissions are falling2/10
  • How it uses materials and handles waste3/10
See all ten questions ↓
Jupiter Fund Management in context

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare with other financial services / banking companies?

Where Jupiter Fund Management sits among financial services / banking peers.

Among the 51 major financial services / banking brands we've scored, Jupiter Fund Management is tied =31st of 51, with 2 others.

=31/51
Jupiter Fund Management's rank
37
Industry average
20
Industry low
65
Industry high
See all 51 in Financial Services / Banking →
What would raise this score

Where Jupiter Fund Management lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Whether its emissions are falling2/10

    Financed footprint rose from 17.8 MtCO2e (2024 restated) to 26.2 MtCO2e (2025).

  2. How it uses materials and handles waste3/10

    Operational waste reported only as 1 tCO2e emissions; capital goods emissions fell 41%.

  3. Its climate targets3/10

    Self-set 46% Scope 1+2 cut by 2030 (2019 baseline), no SBTi validation.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Jupiter Fund Management

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Jupiter Fund Management doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Energy Source (8/10, 6/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Resource Use & Waste (2/10, 3/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 10 sources.

About Jupiter Fund Management

Jupiter Fund Management is a UK-based active asset manager, with roots going back to 1985, with £465.7M revenue (FY2025) and ~468 staff. It operates across equities, bonds, and alternatives, serving institutional and retail clients globally from London headquarters.

Founded
2007
Headquarters
London, United Kingdom
Employees
~468
Annual revenue
£465.7M (FY2025; net revenue £431.0M)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.