MANE is a family-owned French maker of flavours and fragrances, headquartered in Le Bar-sur-Loup. 0 billion sales in 2025.
Head office Le Bar-sur-Loup, FranceStaff ~8,800 (2025)Revenue ~€2.0B (FY2025)Website ↗
MANE's absolute emissions rose in 2025, its total up 3.9% to 917,000 tCO2e, and all its reported progress is per tonne of product. Its electricity is 62% renewable, mostly through certificates, and its water use rose 9%. Its targets are described as SBTi-validated but are intensity targets, and French inspectors asked for corrective action at its Bar-sur-Loup sites in 2025.
MANE scores 43/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified October 2026.
That places MANE joint 322nd of 900 companies scored, and joint 4th of 16 in Chemicals.
What is MANE doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (1/10, 4/10).
Where MANE lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
- Emissions from its own operations8/10No verified figures published with their method and a falling trend.
- Emissions from its supply chain7/10No full value-chain map or supplier engagement programme.
- Whether its emissions are falling1/10No evidence its emissions are falling, not even from energy bills or mileage.
- How clean its energy is5/10Less than half its energy shown to be renewable, or no transition plan.
- Its effect on nature4/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
- How it uses materials and handles waste6/10No verified figures for reuse and recycling across the business.
- Its effect on water4/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
- Its climate targets6/10Its targets aren't validated by the Science Based Targets initiative.
- How openly it reports6/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
- Its record on controversies7/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is MANE's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleHas MANE's score changed?
MANE's score has been reviewed 2 times and currently stands where it started, at 43.
- 43 → 4329 October 2026
Bio correction, score unchanged. Founded 1955 removed: it came from the French register's 1955-01-01 creation date, a placeholder used for companies registered before the register began, not a real date. No filing states when V. Mane Fils was formed.
- Scored 4328 October 2026
Initial public score 43 (publish-draft)
What evidence is MANE's score based on?
13 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
38% of them were published by MANE itself; the rest come from independent sources.
8 of 13 sources are independent of the company.
“Scope 1: 28,467 tCO2e (3%)”
“scores (A- Climate / A- Water / B Forest / A Supplier Engagement”
“"emissions_publication_p11":8947.24”
“reduce our Scope 3 emissions intensity by 58% by 2030 compared to 2018”
“69% reduction in direct carbon emissions”
“B in CDP Forests (palm oil)”
“our pioneering presence in Madagascar since 1975”
“Statut Seveso : Seveso seuil haut”
“Des dépassements des rejets des TAR en AOX ont été constatés.”
“Les sites du Bar-sur-Loup sont certifiés ISO 14 001 depuis 1999”
“sourcing 30% of its energy from solar power”
“Mane is rolling out a ten-year environmental strategy, informed by insights gained through participation in the Convention of Companies for the Climate”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does MANE compare with other chemicals companies?
Where MANE sits among chemicals peers.
Among the 16 major chemicals brands we've scored, MANE is tied =4th of 16, with 1 other.
Who scores higher in Chemicals?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above MANE.
Corbion's total footprint fell from 1.03 MtCO2e in 2021 to 862,000 tCO2e in 2025, against SBTi-validated absolute targets, but its own emissions rose 11% in 2025 as a Thai plant ramped up.
See the breakdown →Novonesis has cut Scope 1+2 emissions 63% absolute since 2018 and hit 100% renewable electricity in 2025, backed by SBTi validation.
See the breakdown →Croda has achieved long-term emissions reductions and secured SBTi validation for aggressive near-term targets, but recent year-on-year data shows Scope 1 rising and downstream emissions climbing.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
See what's behind your number →Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.