Nando's sustainability score: 37/100
Nando's is a casual dining chain specializing in flame-grilled peri-peri chicken, founded in Johannesburg in 1987 and now operating in 35+ countries. A private company with 1,200+ restaurants, it competes in the global quick-service and casual dining sector alongside McDonald's, KFC, and regional chains.
Founded 1987Head office Johannesburg, South AfricaStaff ~19,000Revenue ~£1.37BWebsite ↗
Nando's operates 1,200+ outlets globally with minimal public emissions data despite SBTi validation. Supply chain deforestation and active 2025 water pollution allegations expose fundamental weaknesses in accountability. Intensity-based targets and UK-only renewable electricity claims mask unresolved operational and supply chain impact.
Nando's scores 37/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified May 2026.
That places Nando's joint 482nd of 934 companies scored, and 19th of 51 in Food Service / Restaurants.
What is Nando's doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Energy Source and Targets & Commitments (6/10, 5/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint: Operations and Water Impact (2/10, 2/10).
Where Nando's lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
- Emissions from its own operations2/10No emissions figures for its own operations, not even an estimate from energy bills.
- Emissions from its supply chain3/10No assessment of where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Whether its emissions are falling3/10No evidence its emissions are falling, not even from energy bills or mileage.
- How clean its energy is6/10Less than 90% of its energy shown to be renewable.
- Its effect on nature3/10No assessment of its effect on nature, and no basic environmental policy.
- How it uses materials and handles waste4/10No measurable waste or recycling targets reported publicly.
- Its effect on water2/10No monitoring of water use, or no measures to reduce it.
- Its climate targets5/10Its targets aren't science-based or committed to the Science Based Targets initiative.
- How openly it reports3/10No published sustainability data, or no one named as responsible for it.
- Its record on controversies5/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Nando's's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is Nando's's score based on?
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
17% of them were published by Nando's itself; the rest come from independent sources.
Scored on 4 April 2026 under an earlier version of our method. We're re-checking it under the current method.
10 of 12 sources are independent of the company.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Nando's compare with other food service / restaurants companies?
Where Nando's sits among food service / restaurants peers.
Among the 51 major food service / restaurants brands we've scored, Nando's sits 19th of 51.
Who scores higher in Food Service / Restaurants?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Nando's.
Dishoom's emissions are rising: its own operations' emissions are up 18.5% over two years, and its full footprint grew from 25,600 t in 2021 to 31,545 tCO2e in 2023, 95% of it from its supply chain, mainly ingredients.
See the breakdown →Domino's has SBTi-validated climate targets but relies on intensity-based Scope 3 reductions while absolute emissions from operations are rising.
See the breakdown →Costa Coffee discloses emissions data only through Companies House filings, not directly, and relies on intensity-based targets despite rising absolute emissions (+30% in 2022).
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.