Newmont is a gold miner with comprehensive GHG reporting but rising absolute emissions—no decarbonization has occurred despite ambitious 2030 targets. Submarine tailings disposal at Lihir, repeated water violations at Red Chris, and active lobbying against climate regulation undermine credibility. The company's sustainability narrative masks operational reality.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Transparency & Accountability (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Emissions Trajectory (2/10, 2/10).
14 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 10 major mining & extraction brands we've scored, Newmont sits 2nd of 10.
Score history begins 4 April 2026.
As Newmont's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Newmont Corporation is the world's largest gold producer, founded in 1916, headquartered in Denver, Colorado. The company operates mines globally, producing gold, copper, and other minerals. Following the 2023 acquisition of Newcrest, Newmont expanded its portfolio significantly, becoming a diversified precious metals and copper producer with operations across multiple continents.
Peer major mining operator with similar scale, emissions footprint, and community controversy patterns globally.
View breakdown →Comparable diversified miner facing water, tailings, and decarbonization challenges across multiple continents.
View breakdown →Major extractive company with history of regulatory violations, compliance gaps, and ESG credibility questions.
View breakdown →Gold and copper producer with similar submarine tailings disposal controversy and indigenous land use conflicts.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.