Teck reports comprehensively on emissions and targets net-zero by 2050, but relies on intensity-based 2030 goals rather than absolute reductions. Water pollution remains systemic: selenium levels 267× safe limits, $76M+ in fines, and five new Fisheries Act charges in 2024 signal chronic non-compliance. Lobbying against carbon pricing undermines stated climate ambitions.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Water Impact (2/10, 2/10).
15 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 10 major mining & extraction brands we've scored, Teck Resources sits 1st of 10.
Score history begins 4 April 2026.
As Teck Resources's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Teck Resources is a diversified mining company headquartered in Vancouver, Canada, with major operations in copper, zinc, coal (divested mid-2024), and steelmaking coal. The company operates mines and smelters globally, including the controversial Elk Valley operations in British Columbia. Founded in 2001, it ranks among the world's largest producers of steelmaking coal and zinc.
Major mining peer with significant environmental legacy liabilities and recent water/tailings controversies
View breakdown →Diversified mining company facing similar tailings, water stewardship, and intensity-based carbon target critiques
View breakdown →Zinc and diversified metals producer with comparable emissions reporting and regulatory penalty history
View breakdown →Large copper producer navigating similar energy transition and Scope 3 emissions disclosure challenges
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.