ANTA Sports sustainability score: 41/100
ANTA Sports makes and sells sports footwear, apparel and accessories under brands including ANTA, FILA, DESCENTE, KOLON SPORT and JACK WOLFSKIN. In 2025 apparel was 57.1% of its revenue and footwear 39.3%; the ANTA brand brought in CN¥34,754 million and FILA CN¥28,469 million.
More about ANTA Sports
ANTA Sports Products Limited was incorporated in the Cayman Islands in 2007; its roots go back to 1991. Its head offices are in Xiamen and Jinjiang, China, and it had 69,100 employees at 31 December 2025 and CN¥80.2 billion revenue in 2025.
Founded 2007Head office Xiamen, ChinaStaff ~69,100 regular employees (31 December 2025; plus about 7,000 temporary workers, trainees and interns)Revenue ~CN¥80.2B revenue (2025)Website ↗
ANTA's footprint was 1,473,883 tCO2e in 2025, down from about 1,767,667 t in 2024 while revenue grew 13.3%. Most of the fall in its own emissions comes from green electricity certificates; measured by location, its Scope 1 and 2 rose slightly. About 85% of purchased electricity is covered, mostly by unbundled certificates. Its SBTi-validated targets are a 42% absolute cut in Scope 1 and 2 by 2030 from 2022 and a 51.6% cut in Scope 3 intensity. PwC gave limited assurance over Scope 1, Scope 2 and four Scope 3 categories, but upstream and downstream transport are left out of its Scope 3.
ANTA Sports scores 41/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified November 2026.
That places ANTA Sports joint 394th of 986 companies scored, and joint 30th of 58 in Apparel (Durable / Outdoor).
What is ANTA Sports doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Carbon Footprint: Operations and Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Emissions Trajectory (3/10, 5/10).
Where ANTA Sports lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
- Emissions from its own operations8/10No verified figures published with their method and a falling trend.
- Emissions from its supply chain7/10No full value-chain map or supplier engagement programme.
- Whether its emissions are falling5/10No evidence of a year-on-year fall in its total emissions.
- How clean its energy is5/10Less than half its energy shown to be renewable, or no transition plan.
- Its effect on nature3/10No assessment of its effect on nature, and no basic environmental policy.
- How it uses materials and handles waste5/10No measurable waste or recycling targets reported publicly.
- Its effect on water5/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
- Its climate targets7/10Its targets aren't validated by the Science Based Targets initiative.
- How openly it reports7/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
- Its record on controversies7/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is ANTA Sports's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is ANTA Sports's score based on?
9 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
33% of them were published by ANTA Sports itself; the rest come from independent sources.
“PricewaterhouseCoopers Certified Public Accountants have provided limited assurance on the identified sustainability information provided by the Company”
“pledged to reduce absolute Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 42% by 2030 from a 2022 base year”
“the Group's revenue increased by 13.3% as compared with 2024 to RMB80,219 million”
“In 2024, the company cut its Scope 1 emissions by 11.1% and emissions intensity fell by 21.7%.”
“taking actions to protect biodiversity in its supply chain”
“This company received a score of 18.4%.”
“Energy Use and Climate Change Response”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does ANTA Sports compare with other apparel (durable / outdoor) companies?
Where ANTA Sports sits among apparel (durable / outdoor) peers.
Among the 58 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, ANTA Sports is tied =30th of 58, with 2 others.
Who scores higher in Apparel (Durable / Outdoor)?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above ANTA Sports.
VF's latest footprint was 2,976,871 tCO2e, almost all of it in its supply chain, whose figures lag a year.
See the breakdown →Ecoalf has built a genuine circular model with 294 million plastic bottles recycled and measurable ocean cleanup impact, but fails to publish Scope 1, 2, or 3 emissions figures despite rapid 20% annual growth.
See the breakdown →Fenix Outdoor's footprint was 112,884 tCO2e in 2025, up from 81,341 tCO2e in 2024, partly because Devold was added; it is level with 2019.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.