VF Corporation sustainability score: 43/100
VF owns outdoor and active clothing and footwear brands including The North Face, Vans and Timberland. In its year to March 2026 its Outdoor segment had US$5.7 billion of revenue and its Active segment US$2.7 billion; it sold the Dickies brand in November 2025.
More about VF Corporation
V.F. Corporation is a Pennsylvania company founded in 1899, with its head office in Denver, Colorado. It had about 26,000 employees at the end of that year and revenue of US$9.61 billion.
Founded 1899Head office Denver, United StatesStaff ~26,000 (end of fiscal 2026, March 2026; ~56% full-time)Revenue ~US$9.61B (year to 28 March 2026)Website ↗
VF's latest footprint was 2,976,871 tCO2e, almost all of it in its supply chain, whose figures lag a year. Its own emissions fell to 31,178 t, 69% below FY17, largely through renewable energy credits, which cover most of its 100% renewable electricity claim. Its SBTi-approved targets are absolute: 55% off its own emissions, already met, and 33% off emissions from purchased goods and transport by FY30. A change of method for FY25 cut its supply-chain baseline by 43%, so there is no like-for-like supply-chain trend. Its supply-chain figures are not assured. It backed California's climate disclosure bills in 2024.
VF Corporation scores 43/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified November 2026.
That places VF Corporation joint 339th of 969 companies scored, and joint 24th of 55 in Apparel (Durable / Outdoor).
What is VF Corporation doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Carbon Footprint: Operations and Controversies & Red Flags (9/10, 8/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (4/10, 4/10).
Where VF Corporation lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
- Emissions from its own operations9/10No verified figures published with their method and a falling trend.
- Emissions from its supply chain7/10No full value-chain map or supplier engagement programme.
- Whether its emissions are falling4/10No evidence of a year-on-year fall in its total emissions.
- How clean its energy is6/10Less than 90% of its energy shown to be renewable.
- Its effect on nature4/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
- How it uses materials and handles waste5/10No measurable waste or recycling targets reported publicly.
- Its effect on water5/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
- Its climate targets7/10Its targets aren't validated by the Science Based Targets initiative.
- How openly it reports7/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is VF Corporation's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is VF Corporation's score based on?
10 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
30% of them were published by VF Corporation itself; the rest come from independent sources.
“31,178”
“Scope 2 (Market-Based): 41,856 metric tons of CO2 equivalent”
“Emissions data: Yes, provides history and Scope 3 Category breakdown.”
“4,678,000 MT GHG 4,346,000 MT GHG”
“Scope 1 and 2 are down 69%, but count for about 2% of VF’s footprint.”
“Reduce absolute Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions 55% by the end of Fiscal 2030 from a Fiscal 2017 baseline”
“This company received a score of 21.8%.”
“American Apparel and Footwear Association $150,000”
“VF Corp for climate.”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does VF Corporation compare with other apparel (durable / outdoor) companies?
Where VF Corporation sits among apparel (durable / outdoor) peers.
Among the 55 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, VF Corporation is tied =24th of 55, with 3 others.
Who scores higher in Apparel (Durable / Outdoor)?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above VF Corporation.
Levi Strauss has built credible climate infrastructure—SBTi-validated targets, 81% Scope 1+2 reduction, 100% renewable electricity.
See the breakdown →Nike's footprint was 8,266,474 tCO2e in its 2024 financial year, almost all in its supply chain, and it has fallen each year from 11.8 million tonnes in FY20.
See the breakdown →PUMA's footprint was 1,520,806 tCO2e in 2025, almost all in its supply chain, and it fell 13% on 2024.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.