Forest Green Rovers F.C. sustainability score: 39/100

Joint 4th of 22 in Professional Sports Clubs on this question

FGR has published its operational carbon footprint since 2011, initially under EMAS accreditation and since 2019 under ISO 14001. An independent sector analysis (Scope F, 2022) records FGR's published emissions at 47 tonnes CO₂ per season — an exceptionally small figure reflecting 100% renewable electricity and an organic pitch operation. Market-based Scope 2 is effectively zero given the Ecotricity supply. However, no standalone sustainability report PDF has been found for 2023 or 2024, and no third-party assured GHG inventory with a full Scope 1/2 breakdown by category and multi-year table is publicly available beyond graphical summaries on the club website. This limits the score to 6 rather than 8: full Scope 1 and 2 exist but granular breakdown and third-party assurance on the most recent figures are not independently confirmed.

Joint 7th of 22 in Professional Sports Clubs on this question

No formal Scope 3 inventory has been found for FGR. The club's supply chain is relatively short for a small football club: food is sourced locally in Gloucestershire, kits are made from recycled materials (bamboo, recycled plastic), and travel is acknowledged as a significant category (fan travel, player travel). Sport Positive Leagues (2022/23 data) notes FGR measures carbon emissions of staff, team, and fan travel and reports results on its website, which indicates some supply chain awareness. However, no quantified Scope 3 figure by category is publicly available. The club has committed to 50% emissions cuts by 2030 via UN Race to Zero, which nominally includes all scopes, but without published Scope 3 data this cannot be verified. Given the small scale and locally-oriented supply chain, a score of 3 reflects awareness and partial measurement without formal quantification.

Joint 4th of 22 in Professional Sports Clubs on this question

UNFCCC data published in 2018 records FGR's absolute carbon footprint as having decreased by 3% since 2017, and per-spectator footprint down 42% since 2011/12 — reflecting a decade of effort. The 47 tCO₂ operational total is very small and has been maintained at low levels through sustained renewable energy use. However, the club was promoted to EFL League One in 2022 (larger scale operations, more travel) then relegated to the National League in 2024, meaning the operational scale fluctuated. No multi-year absolute emissions table for 2022–2024 is publicly available to confirm whether absolute emissions rose or fell during the League One period. The 3% absolute reduction documented to 2017 is the most recent verified trend data — now over 7 years old. Score of 5 reflects a genuine historical downward trend at small absolute scale but absence of recent verified multi-year trajectory data. Not capped at 4 because this is not an intensity-only claim: the 47t figure represents absolute operational emissions.

Joint 1st of 22 in Professional Sports Clubs on this question

FGR operates on 100% renewable electricity: approximately 15–20% generated on-site via solar panels (47kW and 2kW arrays) with the remainder supplied by Ecotricity, a dedicated renewable energy supplier using wind and solar. LED scoreboards and boards are powered by a battery charged from solar. The gas supply is provided by Ecotricity via a carbon-neutral gas tariff that covers residual combustion emissions through carbon offsets — this is an offset-based mechanism rather than full electrification. The club is pursuing electric team transport (first electric coach journey in 2022, electric minibus for youth academy). Score of 8 rather than 10 because the gas offset mechanism is not full electrification, and transitioning fossil-fuel combustion entirely to renewable electricity has not yet been completed. Ecotricity's energy is well-sourced (wind turbines and solar), not purely unbundled RECs.

1st of 22 in Professional Sports Clubs on this question

FGR has a documented ecology programme: an organic pitch maintained without pesticides or synthetic chemicals; a baseline biodiversity survey conducted in May 2016 with subsequent bat, reptile, amphibian, badger, breeding bird, and floral surveys; beehives on site; wildflower borders; and wildlife trails hosting rare orchids and slow worms. UN News (2021) quotes a 20% increase in biodiversity on land around the stadium. The planned Eco Park stadium is designed to deliver a 12% biodiversity net gain with over 2km of new hedgerows, thousands of new trees, wetlands, and canal restoration. The pitch grass cuttings are composted for local farmers. Score of 7 rather than 8 because biodiversity outcomes are documented but independent TNFD-aligned disclosure is absent, and Eco Park has not yet been built so planned gains are not yet realised.

Joint 2nd of 22 in Professional Sports Clubs on this question

FGR has eliminated single-use plastics from the stadium. Food is 100% vegan and locally sourced in Gloucestershire, eliminating meat-related supply chain emissions from catering. Waste cooking oil is recycled into biofuel. The 2017/18 season saw a 14.7% reduction in waste. Kits are made from recycled materials (recycled plastic, coffee grounds, bamboo, LENZING ECOVERO certified wood-sourced fibre). The solar-powered robot lawnmower (Mow-bot) generates zero operational emissions for pitch maintenance. The 2023/24 away kit was made from 100% recycled plastic. However, no formal circular targets with verified metrics, measurable waste reduction data post-2018, or published waste tonnage figures for 2022–2024 are available. Score of 6 reflects a genuine, multi-pronged waste and resource minimisation programme with reported results, falling short of 8 due to absence of independently verified, recent quantified waste data.

1st of 22 in Professional Sports Clubs on this question

FGR operates a comprehensive water recycling system: rainwater is harvested from the pitch and stands for irrigation; a partnership with Nijhuis Saur Industries implemented a closed-loop wastewater system converting grey, yellow, and black water streams from away fans' toilets into flush water, irrigation water, fertiliser, and compost. The pitch is irrigated from a mixture of rain, drain, and spring water, reducing dependence on mains supply. UNFCCC data records that in 2016/17 the club recycled over 8% of water from the main supply. Water consumption on site is actively monitored to identify leaks. The organic pitch means no chemical discharge into the water table. No formal water stewardship programme with quantified targets or independently verified reduction data for 2022–2024 is published. Score of 7 reflects an active, multi-mechanism water management programme with genuine circular water use, stopping short of 8 due to absence of recent verified quantified reduction data.

Joint 4th of 22 in Professional Sports Clubs on this question

FGR is a signatory to the UN Sports for Climate Action / Race to Zero framework, committing to a 50% absolute cut in emissions by 2030 and net zero by 2040. This is a publicly stated, absolute target — not intensity-based — which is positive. The club received UN Climate Neutral Now certification in 2018. However, there is no SBTi validation (FGR does not appear on the SBTi target dashboard). The carbon neutral status relies in part on offset-covered gas (Ecotricity carbon-neutral tariff). No independent verification of progress against the 2030 target has been found for 2022–2024. The target framework is credible (UN Race to Zero) but the mechanism for achieving the remaining ~50% reduction is described in outline only on the website without a detailed, independently verified roadmap. Score of 5: specific measurable absolute targets with a credible framework, but not SBTi-validated, and partial offset reliance for gas.

Joint 7th of 22 in Professional Sports Clubs on this question

FGR publishes sustainability information on its 'Another Way' website page and has been doing so since 2011. The club holds ISO 14001 Environmental Management certification and historically held EMAS accreditation (the only football club to do so per UNFCCC). It received an Outstanding Greener Arena Certification 2023 from AGF (a third-party arena certification body), and achieved a perfect score in Sport Positive Leagues' EFL Matrix (2022/23). The club is a founding member of the UN Sports for Climate Action Framework. However, no formal annual sustainability/impact report PDF has been found for 2023 or 2024; no TCFD or CSRD disclosure is published; no board-level sustainability governance structure is publicly described; and no executive compensation linked to sustainability targets is documented. Given the small size of the club, the absence of formal governance structures is less penalisable, but the club's public sustainability positioning warrants more formal accountability mechanisms. Score of 5: sustainability is a documented, evidenced business priority with ISO 14001 and third-party certification, but falls short of 6 due to no dedicated sustainability report, no TCFD disclosure, and no formal board oversight documented.

1st of 22 in Professional Sports Clubs on this question

Starting at 8. No upheld regulatory actions, no greenwashing rulings, no environmental fines, no credible NGO criticism of FGR's environmental claims. No lobbying against climate policy — the opposite is true: owner Dale Vince is an active climate advocate (UN Climate Champion appointed 2019, donated to Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion per InfluenceWatch, lobbied Tory conference for renewable energy). No trade association memberships opposing climate policy have been found. The only 'controversy' found is fan criticism of a climate-themed kit design in 2024, which does not constitute an environmental controversy. The club's carbon neutral claim relies in part on offset-covered gas tariff, which is a mild risk, but this is disclosed and the gas offsets are purchased through Ecotricity's own tariff scheme. Given the clean environmental record and active pro-climate advocacy, a +1 uplift for positive climate advocacy is appropriate, but capped at 9 (not 10) because the offset-covered gas mechanism represents a minor residual concern and the overall transparency of offset quality is limited. Final: 9.