Misto Holdings sustainability score: 22/100
Misto Holdings is a South Korean brand holding company. Its Acushnet golf business, which includes Titleist and FootJoy, made 81.4% of its 2025 revenue; its Misto segment, which includes FILA, made 18.6%.
More about Misto Holdings
Misto Holdings Corporation was established in 1991 as FILA Korea Ltd and took its present name in 2025. It had about 8,500 employees (1,155 in the Misto entities and about 7,300 at Acushnet) and KRW 4.47 trillion revenue in 2025.
Founded 1991Head office Seoul, South KoreaStaff ~8,500 (2025: 1,155 in Misto entities, Sustainability Report 2025 data table; ~7,300 Acushnet associates at 31 December 2025, Form 10-K)Revenue ~KRW 4.47 trillion consolidated revenue (2025)Website ↗
Misto's reported footprint was 18,227 tCO2e in 2025, down from 21,138 t in 2024, but it excludes Acushnet, so the figures cover under a fifth of group revenue and the size deduction for an incomplete footprint (0.70x) applies. For purchased goods, its Scope 3 of 14,893 t counts only finished-product manufacturing at 28 suppliers, not fabric or materials. No renewable electricity share is published. Its only climate target is self-set: an absolute 21% cut in Scope 1 and 2 by 2030 against 2024, with no SBTi target. Several 2022-2024 figures were restated for a 'prior misstatement'. No regulator finding was found; Baptist World Aid scored it 16/100 in 2024.
Misto Holdings scores 22/100 (Significant gaps) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified November 2026.
That places Misto Holdings joint 918th of 986 companies scored, and 46th of 46 in FMCG / Consumer Goods.
What is Misto Holdings doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Transparency & Accountability (7/10, 5/10). Weakest on Energy Source and Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain (1/10, 2/10).
Where Misto Holdings lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
- Emissions from its own operations3/10No emissions figures for its own operations, not even an estimate from energy bills.
- Emissions from its supply chain2/10No assessment of where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Whether its emissions are falling2/10No evidence its emissions are falling, not even from energy bills or mileage.
- How clean its energy is1/10No renewable energy tariff or major efficiency investment shown.
- Its effect on nature3/10No assessment of its effect on nature, and no basic environmental policy.
- How it uses materials and handles waste3/10No active waste reduction, reuse or repair shown.
- Its effect on water3/10No monitoring of water use, or no measures to reduce it.
- Its climate targets3/10No specific targets with dates.
- How openly it reports5/10No dedicated sustainability role, board oversight or public report.
- Its record on controversies7/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Misto Holdings's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is Misto Holdings's score based on?
9 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
22% of them were published by Misto Holdings itself; the rest come from independent sources.
“exclude Acushnet Holdings Corp. and its subsidiaries.”
“We have three company owned and operated golf ball manufacturing facilities, two located in the United States and one in Thailand”
“meaning the true value chain footprint is materially larger than reported.”
“The Seoul-based group recorded consolidated revenue of 4.47 trillion South Korean won (2.98 billion dollars) for the full year, representing an increase of 4.7 percent year-over-year.”
“This company received a CDP Climate Change score of C.”
“2025 Sustainability Report”
“Fila Holdings(081660)published its “Sustainability Report” on the 29th”
“In addition, the brand uses few lower-impact materials. There is also no evidence that it minimises textile waste in its supply chain”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Misto Holdings compare with other fmcg / consumer goods companies?
Misto Holdings sits at the bottom of the fmcg / consumer goods pack.
Among the 46 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, Misto Holdings sits 46th of 46.
Who scores higher in FMCG / Consumer Goods?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Misto Holdings.
P&G achieves strong operational emissions reductions but masks a fundamentally unaligned business model.
See the breakdown →Haribo discloses no group-level carbon emissions, Scope 3 data, or science-based targets despite an estimated 100,000–500,000+ tonne footprint.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.