Nintendo reports comprehensive Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions data with a strong 24% absolute reduction from 2023–2024, but lacks science-based targets, third-party GHG verification, and meaningful renewable energy commitments outside the US. Weaknesses: no SBTi validation, minimal Japan headquarters renewable procurement, absent water strategy, and unquantified circular economy goals.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Carbon Footprint — Operations (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Targets & Commitments and Water Impact (2/10, 2/10).
7 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 21 major electronics / hardware brands we've scored, Nintendo sits 12th of 21.
Score history begins 4 April 2026.
As Nintendo's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Nintendo manufactures and publishes interactive entertainment hardware and software, including the Switch console and Mario/Zelda franchises. Headquartered in Kyoto, it is a leading global player in consumer gaming hardware with significant manufacturing and supply chain exposure to electronics waste and mining impacts.
Consumer electronics competitor with stronger sustainability governance and SBTi commitments than Nintendo.
View breakdown →Technology and gaming conglomerate with published net-zero 2050 roadmap and third-party verified emissions reporting.
View breakdown →Hardware manufacturer with comparable supply chain mining exposure but more advanced circular economy programme.
View breakdown →Electronics company with design-for-recycling focus and transparency; example of deeper circular economy commitment Nintendo lacks.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.