Omega sustainability score: 27/100
Omega is a Swiss luxury watchmaker and a brand of The Swatch Group, headquartered in Biel/Bienne. It makes mechanical and quartz watches within the group’s integrated production, and Omega SA holds Responsible Jewellery Council Code of Practices certification (2026–2029).
Head office Biel/Bienne, SwitzerlandWebsite ↗
Omega publishes no brand-level emissions, water, waste or target data; its footprint is reported only within The Swatch Group’s consolidated figures, which set its scale penalty but earn it no credit. Omega-level evidence is limited to its RJC certification, a biodiversity park at its Biel/Bienne site and coastal conservation projects whose outcomes are not independently verified. WWF’s 2023 rating placed it in the fourth of six tiers, and the Group’s Swiss carbon-neutrality claim rests partly on offsets.
Omega scores 27/100 (Significant gaps) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified October 2026.
That places Omega joint 759th of 934 companies scored, and 6th of 8 in Jewellery & Watches.
What is Omega doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Energy Source (6/10, 4/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint: Operations and Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain (1/10, 1/10).
Where Omega lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
- Emissions from its own operations1/10No emissions figures for its own operations, not even an estimate from energy bills.
- Emissions from its supply chain1/10No assessment of where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Whether its emissions are falling1/10No evidence its emissions are falling, not even from energy bills or mileage.
- How clean its energy is4/10Less than half its energy shown to be renewable, or no transition plan.
- Its effect on nature3/10No assessment of its effect on nature, and no basic environmental policy.
- How it uses materials and handles waste2/10No active waste reduction, reuse or repair shown.
- Its effect on water1/10No figures for its water use.
- Its climate targets1/10No emissions reduction targets.
- How openly it reports3/10No published sustainability data, or no one named as responsible for it.
- Its record on controversies6/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Omega's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleHas Omega's score changed?
Omega's score has moved from 30 to 27 across 3 recorded reviews, down 3 points.
- 31 → 27-417 October 2026
correction: deliberate re-score under v2.5.13 (owner, 2026-10-15) — moved into Jewellery & Watches from a pre-v2.5 record and re-scored under current rules; Q5–Q9 marked on Omega-level evidence only (group data earns a brand no credit, owner 2026-10-17).
- 30 → 31+117 October 2026
correction: deliberate re-score under v2.5.13 (owner, 2026-10-15) — moved into Jewellery & Watches from a pre-v2.5 record and re-scored under current rules; Q8 marked on brand-level evidence only (group targets earn a brand no credit, owner 2026-10-17).. Sector corrected "Electronics / Hardware" (base 40) → "Jewellery & Watches" (base 40), sourced from EDITORIAL Owner decision 2026-10-15: Jewellery & Watches (v2.5.13; brand-vs-parent ruling)
- Scored 309 April 2026
Initial score at platform launch
What evidence is Omega's score based on?
9 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
33% of them were published by Omega itself; the rest come from independent sources.
“This report covers the entire Swatch Group with all its subsidiaries”
“18 February, 2026 - 18 February, 2029”
“Procurement of renewable electricity through a mix of financing of projects, prioritizing bundled certificates, PPAs and as a last resort GoOs certificates.”
“100 hectares of abandoned ponds are being converted into mangrove forests”
“Four Swatch Group–owned brands (Omega, Tissot, Swatch, and Longines) received lower ratings, which put them in the fourth of the WWF's six tiers.”
“Pandora was ranked 'upper midfield' along with other prominent brands, including TAG Heuer, Omega, Tissot, Swatch and Longines.”
“the first partner to Clean Up Space”
“supporting major production hubs such as ETA and Omega”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Omega compare with other jewellery & watches companies?
Where Omega sits among jewellery & watches peers.
Among the 8 major jewellery & watches brands we've scored, Omega sits 6th of 8.
Who scores higher in Jewellery & Watches?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Omega.
Swatch Group reports declining absolute emissions across Scopes 1–2 (31% since 2021) and Scope 3 (27% since 2023), but has no group Scope 3 target yet, although Scope 3 is 96% of its footprint.
See the breakdown →Richemont has cut its own Scope 1 and 2 emissions sharply since 2019, but Scope 3, 98.7% of its footprint, is up 21.4% on the 2019 base year and its Scope 3 target is relative rather than absolute.
See the breakdown →Cartier publishes no emissions figures of its own; its footprint sits inside Richemont's group report, which sets its scale penalty but earns it no credit.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.