Ravensburger sustainability score: 24/100
Ravensburger AG is a German family-owned maker of games, puzzles and creative products, headquartered in Ravensburg, whose brands include BRIO and ThinkFun. It generated €744M in revenue with 2,515 employees in 2025.
Head office Ravensburg, GermanyStaff ~2,515 (2025)Revenue €744M revenue (FY 2025, company press release)Website ↗
Ravensburger publishes no emissions data for operations or its supply chain and no water figures. It says its production sites have used renewable electricity since 2023, but gives no share of total energy and no verification. Packaging improvements are real but incremental, and it has no dated waste or material target.
Ravensburger scores 24/100 (Significant gaps) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified November 2026.
That places Ravensburger joint 901st of 1,017 companies scored, and joint 53rd of 57 in FMCG / Consumer Goods.
What is Ravensburger doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Energy Source (8/10, 6/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Emissions Trajectory (0/10, 1/10).
Where Ravensburger lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
- Emissions from its own operations2/10No emissions figures for its own operations, not even an estimate from energy bills.
- Emissions from its supply chain3/10No assessment of where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Whether its emissions are falling1/10No evidence its emissions are falling, not even from energy bills or mileage.
- How clean its energy is6/10Less than 90% of its energy shown to be renewable.
- Its effect on nature3/10No assessment of its effect on nature, and no basic environmental policy.
- How it uses materials and handles waste5/10No measurable waste or recycling targets reported publicly.
- Its effect on water0/10No figures for its water use.
- Its climate targets4/10Its targets aren't science-based or committed to the Science Based Targets initiative.
- How openly it reports4/10No dedicated sustainability role, board oversight or public report.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Ravensburger's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is Ravensburger's score based on?
18 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
39% of them were published by Ravensburger itself; the rest come from independent sources.
11 of 18 sources are independent of the company.
“Seit Mai 2024 liefert eine Photovoltaikanlage am Hauptsitz in Ravensburg bis zu 113 Kilowatt Spitzenleistung.”
“Konzernabschluss zum Geschäftsjahr vom 01.01.2024 bis zum 31.12.2024”
“erwirtschafteten 2.515 Mitarbeiter einen Umsatz von 744 Millionen Euro”
“Ravensburger achieved carbon transparency for Scope 3 emissions in 20 days”
“Rund die Hälfte unserer Produkte produzieren wir an den Standorten Ravensburg in Deutschland und Polička in Tschechien in Eigenfertigung.”
“Rund zwei Drittel unserer Produkte entstehen in eigener Herstellung”
“Die Auswahl und Überprüfung der Lieferanten erfolgen nach klar definierten sozialen und ökologischen Kriterien.”
“internal operations were C0 2 neutral”
“Almost all of the company's sites became CO2 -neutral by the end of last year”
“Seit 2023 betreiben wir unsere Produktionsstätten mit Strom aus erneuerbaren Quellen.”
“Since 2021, the site’s entire electricity demand has been covered by renewable energy sources.”
“der vorwiegend aus dem Schwarzwald und aus recyceltem Material stammt”
“Bei der Anlage unserer Wiesen setzen wir bewusst auf regionales Saatgut mit heimischen Wildpflanzen.”
“Ressourcenschonende Materialien, zertifizierte”
“21 March 2024”
“In der Unternehmensverantwortung wurde Ravensburger mit”
“Ravensburger My first wooden puzzles Unterwegs im Zoo”
“DEUTSCHER VERBAND DER SPIELWARENINDUSTRIE E.V.”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Ravensburger compare with other fmcg / consumer goods companies?
Where Ravensburger sits among fmcg / consumer goods peers.
Among the 57 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, Ravensburger is tied =53rd of 57, with 1 other.
Who scores higher in FMCG / Consumer Goods?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Ravensburger.
The Body Shop has published almost no sustainability data since 2022 and abandoned all climate targets after Natura & Co ownership ended.
See the breakdown →P&G achieves strong operational emissions reductions but masks a fundamentally unaligned business model.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.