Hasbro sustainability score: 44/100
Hasbro is a toy and entertainment company whose brands include Transformers, My Little Pony and Monopoly. FY2025 revenue was $4.7 billion, with approximately 4,520 employees worldwide.
Head office United StatesStaff ~4,520 (2025)Revenue $4,701.3M net revenues (FY ended 28 Dec 2025)Website ↗
Hasbro reports emissions with limited assurance and has cut Scope 1 and 2, partly through office closures. But Scope 3 rose in 2025 and leaves out five categories, plastic packaging has climbed since it reversed a plastic-free plan in 2023, and factory energy and water are not counted. Its SBTi status is unconfirmed.
Hasbro scores 44/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified November 2026.
That places Hasbro joint 312th of 1,017 companies scored, and joint 11th of 57 in FMCG / Consumer Goods.
What is Hasbro doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Carbon Footprint: Operations and Transparency & Accountability (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Resource Use & Waste and Emissions Trajectory (3/10, 4/10).
Where Hasbro lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
- Emissions from its own operations8/10No verified figures published with their method and a falling trend.
- Emissions from its supply chain6/10No full value-chain map or supplier engagement programme.
- Whether its emissions are falling4/10No evidence of a year-on-year fall in its total emissions.
- How clean its energy is5/10Less than half its energy shown to be renewable, or no transition plan.
- Its effect on nature4/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
- How it uses materials and handles waste3/10No active waste reduction, reuse or repair shown.
- Its effect on water4/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
- Its climate targets6/10Its targets aren't validated by the Science Based Targets initiative.
- How openly it reports7/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
- Its record on controversies6/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Hasbro's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is Hasbro's score based on?
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
17% of them were published by Hasbro itself; the rest come from independent sources.
Hasbro's total is the sum of its published Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 lines (it prints no all-scope total). It covers Scope 3 categories 1 to 7, including purchased goods; categories 8, 9, 11, 12 and 14 are not quantified.
10 of 12 sources are independent of the company.
“Total Direct (Scope 1)3,4 6,188 4,453 4,176 3,430”
“we are exploring Power Purchase Agreements”
“we published a Climate and Nature Transition Plan and an IFRS S2 disclosure”
“This company received a CDP Forests score of C.”
“16.26 / 100”
“Hasbro is reintroducing plastic windows and blisters to the packaging for its 6-inch fan figurines”
“Originally, the company planned to remove almost all the plastic from its toy packaging”
“Less than a year after introducing plastic-free packaging, Hasbro is reintroducing clear plastic windows and blister packs”
“Hasbro is a member of The Toy Association, which lobbies on issues including the regulation of potentially hazardous chemicals in toys”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Hasbro compare with other fmcg / consumer goods companies?
Where Hasbro sits among fmcg / consumer goods peers.
Among the 57 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, Hasbro is tied =11th of 57, with 2 others.
Who scores higher in FMCG / Consumer Goods?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Hasbro.
Natura &Co demonstrates strong biodiversity leadership and transparent climate accountability, having exceeded its 2030 Scope 1&2 target early.
See the breakdown →Who Gives A Crap has built genuine credibility through B Corp certification, FSC Chain-of-Custody accreditation, and zero-virgin-pulp sourcing.
See the breakdown →Chopard has published its first formal sustainability report and committed to SBTi-aligned targets, but lacks verified emissions data across all scopes.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.