SaaS / Digital Services·Founded 2019

Library of Things sustainability score: 55/100

Library of Things is a UK-based SaaS platform enabling shared access to tools and appliances through self-service kiosks in libraries and community spaces.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewMixed evidence· 9 src

Library of Things has negligible operational emissions and structurally reduces consumption through product sharing. Transparency is above-average for an SME through mission-lock governance and annual impact reporting. Critical gap: no formal operational emissions targets, supply chain quantification, or energy strategy—and academic critique questions whether sourcing new items rather than utilising existing goods contradicts sustainability claims.

Library of Things scores 55/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified June 2026.

That places Library of Things joint 50th of 847 companies scored, and joint 11th of 76 in SaaS / Digital Services.

At a glance

Library of Things's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Its record on controversies8/10
  • How it uses materials and handles waste7/10
Weakest
  • Emissions from its own operations3/10
  • Emissions from its supply chain3/10
See all ten questions ↓
Library of Things in context

How does Library of Things compare with other saas / digital services companies?

Where Library of Things sits among saas / digital services peers.

Among the 76 major saas / digital services brands we've scored, Library of Things is tied =11th of 76, with 2 others.

=11/76
Library of Things's rank
42
Industry average
25
Industry low
71
Industry high
See all 76 in SaaS / Digital Services →
What would raise this score

Where Library of Things lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Emissions from its own operations3/10

    No formal Scope 1, 2, or 3 operational emissions published.

  2. Emissions from its supply chain3/10

    No formal Scope 3 calculation.

  3. Whether its emissions are falling3/10

    No multi-year operational emissions dataset exists.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Library of Things

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Library of Things doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Resource Use & Waste (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (3/10, 3/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 9 sources.

About Library of Things

Library of Things is a UK-based SaaS platform enabling shared access to tools and appliances through self-service kiosks in libraries and community spaces. Founded in 2019 and based in London, the company operates roughly 20 kiosks and extends product lifecycles through borrowing rather than purchase, primarily serving the London market.

Founded
2019
Headquarters
GB
Employees
~20
Annual revenue
~£800K
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.