Too Good To Go sustainability score: 53/100
Too Good To Go is a Copenhagen-based SaaS marketplace connecting consumers with surplus food from restaurants, bakeries, and grocery stores at discounted prices. Founded in 2016, the company operates in 19 countries and has saved over 135 million meals from waste.
More about Too Good To Go
Its core business model directly addresses food waste reduction—a major lever for environmental impact.
Founded 2016Head office Copenhagen, DenmarkStaff ~1,900Revenue ~€97M (DKK 725M, FY2024 ApS)Website ↗
Too Good To Go's core mission—reducing food waste—delivers genuine environmental impact, offsetting weak operational climate reporting. The company stopped disclosing emissions data after 2020 when its verification partner Planetly shut down. Growth from 350 to 1,900 employees since 2019 almost certainly increased absolute emissions, yet no post-2020 figures exist. B Corp certification and clean regulatory record are genuine strengths; climate strategy is not.
Too Good To Go scores 53/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified May 2026.
That places Too Good To Go joint 87th of 934 companies scored, and joint 14th of 73 in SaaS / Digital Services.
What is Too Good To Go doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Transparency & Accountability (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain (2/10, 3/10).
Where Too Good To Go lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
- Emissions from its own operations4/10No full Scope 1 and 2 figures worked out to the GHG Protocol.
- Emissions from its supply chain3/10No assessment of where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Whether its emissions are falling2/10No evidence its emissions are falling, not even from energy bills or mileage.
- How clean its energy is3/10No renewable energy tariff or major efficiency investment shown.
- Its effect on nature5/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
- How it uses materials and handles waste6/10No verified figures for reuse and recycling across the business.
- Its effect on water4/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
- Its climate targets3/10No specific targets with dates.
- How openly it reports7/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Too Good To Go's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is Too Good To Go's score based on?
11 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
45% of them were published by Too Good To Go itself; the rest come from independent sources.
Scored on 4 April 2026 under an earlier version of our method. We're re-checking it under the current method.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Too Good To Go compare with other saas / digital services companies?
Where Too Good To Go sits among saas / digital services peers.
Among the 73 major saas / digital services brands we've scored, Too Good To Go is tied =14th of 73, with 3 others.
Who scores higher in SaaS / Digital Services?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Too Good To Go.
Library of Things has negligible operational emissions and structurally reduces consumption through product sharing.
See the breakdown →Wren is a carbon offset platform operating in a structurally contested market.
See the breakdown →SAP's market-based emissions fell about 9% from 2023 to 2025, to 6.3 MtCO2e, against a target to cut them 90% by 2030.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.