Electronic Arts sustainability score: 55/100
Electronic Arts is a multinational video game and digital entertainment company headquartered in Redwood Shores, California. With ~11,000 employees and $7.4 billion in annual revenue (FY2022), EA develops and publishes games across console, PC, and mobile platforms.
More about Electronic Arts
As a digital-first business, its operational footprint is relatively light, but supply chain emissions from hardware and services procurement represent significant exposure.
Founded 1982Head office Redwood Shores, United StatesStaff ~14,500Revenue $7.43B (FY2022)Website ↗
EA discloses Scope 1 & 2 emissions with GHG Protocol alignment and tracks a 19% absolute reduction over two years, but Scope 3 targets lack validation and rely on offsets. Renewable energy is at 95% without disclosed procurement instruments. The core weakness: SBTi validation pending, no supplier engagement programme, and Scope 3 exclusion from 2027 carbon neutrality commitment.
Electronic Arts scores 55/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified May 2026.
That places Electronic Arts joint 54th of 934 companies scored, and joint 9th of 73 in SaaS / Digital Services.
What is Electronic Arts doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Energy Source and Controversies & Red Flags (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Resource Use & Waste (4/10, 4/10).
Where Electronic Arts lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
- Emissions from its own operations6/10Its own emissions aren't independently verified or tracked over several years.
- Emissions from its supply chain5/10Most of its supply-chain (Scope 3) emissions aren't measured.
- Whether its emissions are falling6/10No consistent fall over several years across its operations and supply chain.
- How clean its energy is7/10Less than 90% of its energy shown to be renewable.
- Its effect on nature4/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
- How it uses materials and handles waste4/10No measurable waste or recycling targets reported publicly.
- Its effect on water4/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
- Its climate targets4/10Its targets aren't science-based or committed to the Science Based Targets initiative.
- How openly it reports6/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
- Its record on controversies7/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Electronic Arts's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is Electronic Arts's score based on?
8 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
50% of them were published by Electronic Arts itself; the rest come from independent sources.
Scored on 11 April 2026 under an earlier version of our method. We're re-checking it under the current method.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Electronic Arts compare with other saas / digital services companies?
Where Electronic Arts sits among saas / digital services peers.
Among the 73 major saas / digital services brands we've scored, Electronic Arts is tied =9th of 73, with 2 others.
Who scores higher in SaaS / Digital Services?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Electronic Arts.
ServiceNow has cut Scope 1&2 emissions 80% since 2019, exceeding its SBTi target, and maintains 100% renewable electricity.
See the breakdown →GoTo reports Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions without third-party assurance.
See the breakdown →Palantir discloses carbon emissions annually with GHG Protocol methodology but refuses third-party verification, undercutting credibility.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.