CCEP's Scope 1, 2 and 3 targets are SBTi-validated and its emissions data carries EY limited assurance. Absolute Scope 1–3 emissions were 13.6% below the 2019 baseline in 2024, against a 30%-by-2030 target. Group renewable electricity was 60.2% in 2024, with Europe near-complete and the APS region fossil-heavy. A 2024 greenwashing complaint in France and regulatory corrections on recycling claims are on record. Scope 3 supply-chain coverage is incomplete and biodiversity targets are early-stage.
This score is built from public data only. If your practice is stronger than your disclosure, submit evidence for review — or challenge any question, free.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (5/10, 5/10).
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
7 of 12 sources are third-party verified or public record.
“Scope 1 GHG emissions (tonnes of CO2e) 357,043 [2024] … Scope 2 GHG emissions — market based approach (tonnes of CO2e) 360,940”
“Ernst & Young LLP (EY) was engaged to perform limited assurance in accordance with ISAE 3000 (revised)”
“carbon strategic suppliers (which represent around 80% of CCEP's scope 3 GHG emissions) to set their own SBTi targets”
“as a member of The Climate Group's RE100 initiative, we have committed to using 100% renewable electricity across all of our markets by 2030”
“In 2024, we carried out a nature and biodiversity risk assessment across our value chain in line with Steps 1 and 2 of the SBTN methodology.”
“planting of approximately 55,000 native trees, shrubs, and grasses across 55 hectares of land”
“We reached 46% recycled PET (rPET) across the Group in 2024 … reaching 63.2% [in Europe]”
“In May 2025 … Coca-Cola was compelled to amend its recycling claims in the European Union”
“Total water withdrawal (1,000 m3) 36,740 … Water replenished as percentage of total sales volumes (%) 109.8 [2024]”
“In 2025, CCEP grew its business while reducing its absolute GHG emissions (Scope 1, 2 and 3) by 18.9% since 2019.”
“FNE porte plainte contre Coca-Cola Europacific Partners France pour pratiques commerciales trompeuses ou 'greenwashing'”
“This company received a CDP Climate Change score of A.”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 42 major food & beverage (non-meat) brands we've scored, Coca-Cola Europacific Partners sits 12th of 42.
Score history begins —.
As Coca-Cola Europacific Partners's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners is a bottler and distributor of Coca-Cola branded beverages operating across Europe, Australia, and the Asia-Pacific region. The plc was incorporated in 2015 and the operating merger that created the business completed in 2016. CCEP is the world's largest independent Coca-Cola bottler by revenue, producing and selling ready-to-drink products including sparkling soft drinks, water, and juices.
Parent company; operates majority stake; global beverage manufacturer and franchisor.
View breakdown →Direct competitor; global beverage and snack food company; similar scale and supply chains.
View breakdown →Peer bottler and packaged beverage manufacturer; similar water and packaging dependencies.
View breakdown →Industry peer; diversified food and beverage; comparable supply chain and nature risk exposure.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.