Natural Balance Foods·Food & Beverage (non-meat)·St Albans, United Kingdom·Founded 1976·Last verified 29 May 2026
36
out of 100
Below expectationsPending Review

Natural Balance Foods operates with near-total transparency gaps: no standalone carbon data, energy sourcing, or waste metrics despite international supply chains and plastic packaging. Parent-level SBTi commitment exists but does not cascade to the subsidiary. WeForest tree-planting since 2014 is the only named climate action but lacks recent verification. Clean record on controversies.

The calculation

Every score shows its working.

Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale
Industry base impact
Food & Beverage (non-meat) sector ceiling.
50 / 100
Performance score
Sum of the 10 rubric questions, scored 0–10 each.
30 / 100
Raw score
Weighted average before scale penalty.
(0.3 × 50) + (0.7 × 30) = 36.0
Scale penalty
Multiplier based on absolute emissions volume — physics-first.
× 1
Final score
Rounded. Below expectations.
36 / 100
The ten questions

Where Natural Balance Foods is strong, and where it isn't.

Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (8/10, 3/10). Weakest on Transparency & Accountability and Energy Source (2/10, 2/10).

Where the evidence comes from

Every document used, listed.

8 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.

[1]Self-reported
Natural Balance Foods — Nakd Forest Community Page
Ongoing
Q5
View →
[2]Self-reported
Natural Balance Foods — FAQ: New to Nakd & Trek
Ongoing
Q2Q5Q6
View →
[3]Self-reported
Natural Balance Foods — Homepage
Ongoing
Q1Q4Q9Q10
View →
[4]Self-reported
Lotus Bakeries — Our Environment
Ongoing
Q1Q2Q3
View →
[5]Self-reported
Lotus Bakeries — Annual Report & ESG Compilation 2023
2023
Q4Q6Q7
View →
[6]Self-reported
Lotus Bakeries — Sustainability Reporting & Disclosure
Ongoing
Q8
View →
[7]Self-reported
Lotus Bakeries — Reporting & Disclosure
Ongoing
Q9
View →
[8]Public record
The Grocer — Trek and Nakd Maker Natural Balance Foods Sinks to Loss on £11m VAT Bill
2024
Q3Q10
View →

If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.

Natural Balance Foods in context

Where Natural Balance Foods sits among food & beverage (non-meat) peers.

Among the 41 major food & beverage (non-meat) brands we've scored, Natural Balance Foods is tied =34th of 41, with 2 others.

=34/41
Natural Balance Foods's rank
43
Industry average
31
Industry low
57
Industry high
How this score has moved

Natural Balance Foods's score over time.

today

Score history begins 29 May 2026.

As Natural Balance Foods's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.

We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.

What's being contested

This score is not currently being contested.

Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.

No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.

About Natural Balance Foods

Natural Balance Foods is a UK-based plant-based snack bar manufacturer, producing vegan nutrition bars under brands including Nakd and Trek. Owned by Belgian group Lotus Bakeries, it operates from St Albans with approximately 40 employees and £57.5m annual revenue, sourcing dates, nuts, oats, and RSPO-certified palm oil from international suppliers.

Founded
1976
Headquarters
St Albans, United Kingdom
Employees
~40
Annual revenue
~£57.5M
Company website ↗
Track Natural Balance Foods

We'll let you know when the score moves.

Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.

THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

HOW SINK STAYS INDEPENDENT

Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.