Apparel (Durable / Outdoor)

Deckers Brands sustainability score: 36/100

Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)

About Deckers Brands

Deckers designs and sells footwear, apparel and accessories, mainly under the HOKA, UGG and Teva brands; independent contractors make all its products. Its sales come mainly from UGG and HOKA, through retailers and distributors and through its own websites and shops.

More about Deckers Brands

Deckers Outdoor Corporation was incorporated in California in 1975 and moved its legal home to Delaware in 1993; its head office is in Goleta, California. It had about 6,000 employees at 31 March 2026 and net sales of about US$5.47 billion in the year to that date.

Founded 1975Head office Goleta, United StatesStaff ~6,000 (31 March 2026)Revenue ~US$5.47B net sales (year to 31 March 2026)Website ↗

Read Deckers Brands' own report ↗

Our verdict

Deckers' footprint was 1,352,815 tCO2e in its FY26 year, over 99% of it in its supply chain, up 24% on the year before and 56% on its FY19 baseline. Its Goleta head office runs on 100% renewable electricity, but it publishes no group-wide renewable share. Its SBTi-approved targets are a 46% absolute cut in its own emissions by FY30 and a 58% cut in supply-chain emissions per $m of gross profit, an intensity measure; its own emissions are 9.08% above baseline. Bureau Veritas checked its own-operations figures but not its supply chain. IPE's supply-chain index scores it 18.5/100.

Deckers Brands scores 36/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified November 2026.

That places Deckers Brands joint 530th of 969 companies scored, and joint 39th of 55 in Apparel (Durable / Outdoor).

The ten questions

What is Deckers Brands doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint: Operations and Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Energy Source (0/10, 3/10).

What's missing

Where Deckers Brands lost points

For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.

  • Emissions from its own operations7/10Its own emissions aren't independently verified or tracked over several years.
  • Emissions from its supply chain7/10No full value-chain map or supplier engagement programme.
  • Whether its emissions are falling0/10No evidence its emissions are falling, not even from energy bills or mileage.
  • How clean its energy is3/10No renewable energy tariff or major efficiency investment shown.
  • Its effect on nature4/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
  • How it uses materials and handles waste5/10No measurable waste or recycling targets reported publicly.
  • Its effect on water4/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
  • Its climate targets6/10Its targets aren't validated by the Science Based Targets initiative.
  • How openly it reports7/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
  • Its record on controversies7/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.

The calculation

How is Deckers Brands's SINK score calculated?

Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale
Industry base impact
Apparel (Durable / Outdoor) sector ceiling.
30 / 100
Performance score
Sum of the ten questions, each scored 0 to 10.
50 / 100
Raw score
Weighted average before scale penalty.
(0.3 × 30) + (0.7 × 50) = 44.0
Scale penalty
Multiplier based on total emissions. Bigger polluters lose more.
× 0.82
Final score
Rounded. Below expectations.
36 / 100
Where the evidence comes from

What evidence is Deckers Brands's score based on?

9 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.

22% of them were published by Deckers Brands itself; the rest come from independent sources.

[1]Self-reported
FY26 Creating Change Report (April 2025–March 2026)

“to provide limited assurance of its Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions data included in its FY2026 Creating Change”

2025
Q1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9
View →
[2]Independent source
Better Trail — HOKA Sustainability Profile

“Scope 3 emissions account for 99% of Deckers' total footprint, making them by far the most important source of emissions for the company to address.”

Ongoing
Q2Q3Q6Q8Q10
View →
[3]Independent source
Shop Ethical! — Deckers Company Profile

“This company received a CDP Forests score of C.”

Ongoing
Q5Q7Q9Q10
View →
[4]Independent source
Good On You — UGG Brand Directory

“It uses some lower-impact materials including recycled materials, however it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials used.”

Ongoing
Q6Q8
View →
[5]Independent source
The Commons — UGG Brand Rating

“It uses some renewable energy to power its production sites and 100 % renewable in its owned and operated facilities”

Ongoing
Q4
View →
[6]Independent source
The Commons — HOKA Brand Rating

“Deckers also has general energy efficiency projects at its production sites and offices”

Ongoing
Q4
View →
[7]SEC filing
Deckers Brands FY2026 Form 10-K (SEC Filing)

“during fiscal year 2026 , we adopted a comprehensive Climate Transition Plan”

2026
Q9
View →
[8]Public record
California Air Resources Board — SB 261 Climate Risk Submission (Docket 56836)

“Deckers - Consolidated Climate-Related Financial Risk Report (SB 261)”

2025
Q9
View →
[9]Self-reported
Deckers Responsibility Hub

“Read our Creating Change report to learn more.”

Ongoing
Q9
View →

If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.

For Deckers Brands

Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)

Free. Once you confirm, this page says “Profile claimed by Deckers Brands” and we email you when the score changes. Claiming changes nothing about the score. More than one person can claim a company. Privacy

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Send new evidence, free

    Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.

    How to send evidence →
  • Put your score on your website, free

    It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.

    Deckers Brands: SINK sustainability score 36/100.

Track this score

We'll send one email to confirm. Every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy

Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →

We reply within 5 working days.

Want your own page like this?

Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.

Score my business free
Deckers Brands in context

How does Deckers Brands compare with other apparel (durable / outdoor) companies?

Where Deckers Brands sits among apparel (durable / outdoor) peers.

Among the 55 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, Deckers Brands is tied =39th of 55, with 5 others.

=39/55
Deckers Brands's rank
41
Industry average
18
Industry low
55
Industry high
See all 55 in Apparel (Durable / Outdoor) →
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

Find your page and claim it, free →

Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.