M&G scores 35/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment — scored from public data only, no company payment can change a number. Last verified August 2026.
That places M&G joint 369th of 650 companies scored, and joint 27th of 44 in Financial Services / Banking.
M&G manages £375.9B in assets while holding £1.5B in coal exposure and material fossil-fuel investments. Operational emissions targets are absolute and credible, but portfolio decarbonisation relies on intensity metrics that allow financed emissions to rise with AUM growth. Core weakness: asset manager climate alignment is compromised by fossil-sector holdings without documented divestment policy.
This score is built from public data only. If your practice is stronger than your disclosure, submit evidence for review — or challenge any question, free.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Energy Source (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Water Impact (4/10, 4/10).
9 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
“GHG emissions statement in accordance with the Companies (Directors' Report) and Limited Liability Partnerships (Energy and Carbon Report) Regulations 2018”
“environmental metrics cover 70% (2024: 69%) of Group AUMA as at 31 December 2025”
“Achieved 100% renewable electricity across our in-scope corporate office in 2025”
“50% reduction in emissions intensity (tCO2e/$m invested) for in-scope public equity and corporate debt by 2030”
“M&G plc joins RE100, which committed us to reach 100% renewable energy for our corporate operations”
“Based on the asset manager's assessment of the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) high-risk sector in our listed equity and corporate bond exposures, we have created a target list of companies for engagement”
“M&G's total exposure to coal is $1.5 billion, including holdings in NTPC, Sumitomo and POSCO”
“asset managers continue to hold equity investment portfolios misaligned with Paris Agreement goals, while their efforts to drive the transition through stewardship have stagnated”
“M&G's climate commitments include targets to reduce carbon emissions from operations to net zero by 2030”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Where M&G sits among financial services / banking peers.
Among the 44 major financial services / banking brands we've scored, M&G is tied =27th of 44, with 1 other.
Score history begins —.
As M&G's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
This score is not currently being contested.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
M&G plc is a UK-based financial services and asset management firm founded in 1901, headquartered in London. It manages £375.9B in assets under management across equities, bonds, alternatives, and real estate. As an asset manager and asset owner, M&G's sustainability impact is dominated by financed emissions from its investment portfolios rather than direct operations.
Peer asset manager; £375.9B AUM; comparable fossil-fuel portfolio exposure and divestment policy scrutiny.
View breakdown →UK financial services peer; significant financed emissions footprint and coal/fossil sector engagement questions.
View breakdown →UK-headquartered financial services; comparable scale of financed emissions and climate commitment gap.
View breakdown →Global financial institution; material fossil-fuel exposure and documented coal holdings comparable to M&G.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.