M&G sustainability score: 35/100

·Financial Services / Banking·London, United Kingdom·Founded 1901·Last verified 29 August 2026
35
out of 100
Below expectationsPending ReviewMixed evidence· 9 src

M&G scores 35/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment — scored from public data only, no company payment can change a number. Last verified August 2026.

That places M&G joint 452nd of 790 companies scored, and 25th of 46 in Financial Services / Banking.

M&G manages £375.9B in assets while holding £1.5B in coal exposure and material fossil-fuel investments. Operational emissions targets are absolute and credible, but portfolio decarbonisation relies on intensity metrics that allow financed emissions to rise with AUM growth. Core weakness: asset manager climate alignment is compromised by fossil-sector holdings without documented divestment policy.

For buyers

Buy from M&G? Check your whole supplier list.

Every supplier scored from public evidence like this, ranked, in 48 hours. No questionnaires, and your suppliers never know.

Check your suppliers →
Is this your company?

Think we've missed something? Tell us, free.

This score uses public evidence only. Challenge any question for free, or ask for a human review of evidence you haven't published.

Evidence review, £99 →
The calculation

How is M&G's SINK score calculated?

Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale
Industry base impact
Financial Services / Banking sector ceiling.
50 / 100
Performance score
Sum of the 10 rubric questions, scored 0–10 each.
51 / 100
Raw score
Weighted average before scale penalty.
(0.3 × 50) + (0.7 × 51) = 50.7
Scale penalty
Multiplier based on absolute emissions volume — physics-first.
× 0.7
Final score
Rounded. Below expectations.
35 / 100
The ten questions

What is M&G doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Energy Source (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Water Impact (4/10, 4/10).

Where the evidence comes from

What evidence is M&G's score based on?

9 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.

[1]Self-reported
Corporate Environment Performance

“GHG emissions statement in accordance with the Companies (Directors' Report) and Limited Liability Partnerships (Energy and Carbon Report) Regulations 2018”

2025
Q1Q2Q4Q6Q7
View →
[2]Self-reported
Environmental Metrics Basis of Reporting 2025

“environmental metrics cover 70% (2024: 69%) of Group AUMA as at 31 December 2025”

2025
Q2Q6Q7
View →
[3]Self-reported
Financing the Climate Transition

“Achieved 100% renewable electricity across our in-scope corporate office in 2025”

2025
Q3Q8
View →
[4]Self-reported
Sustainability Accessible Report 2023

“50% reduction in emissions intensity (tCO2e/$m invested) for in-scope public equity and corporate debt by 2030”

2023
Q3
View →
[5]Self-reported
Climate Transition Plan July 2025

“M&G plc joins RE100, which committed us to reach 100% renewable energy for our corporate operations”

2025
Q4Q9
View →
[6]Self-reported
Developing Our Approach to Nature

“Based on the asset manager's assessment of the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) high-risk sector in our listed equity and corporate bond exposures, we have created a target list of companies for engagement”

2025
Q5
View →
[7]Third-party verified
M&G Coal Exit Policy Misses Mark

“M&G's total exposure to coal is $1.5 billion, including holdings in NTPC, Sumitomo and POSCO”

2021
Q10
View →
[8]Third-party verified
Asset Managers Climate Change 2023

“asset managers continue to hold equity investment portfolios misaligned with Paris Agreement goals, while their efforts to drive the transition through stewardship have stagnated”

2023
Q10
View →
[9]Public record
M&G Takes Climate Plans to Shareholders, Adds Net Zero Goal to Incentive Plan

“M&G's climate commitments include targets to reduce carbon emissions from operations to net zero by 2030”

2022
Q8Q9
View →

If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.

M&G in context

How does M&G compare with other financial services / banking companies?

Where M&G sits among financial services / banking peers.

Among the 46 major financial services / banking brands we've scored, M&G sits 25th of 46.

25/46
M&G's rank
38
Industry average
23
Industry low
65
Industry high
How this score has moved

Has M&G's score changed?

today

As M&G's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.

What's being contested

Has M&G's score been challenged?

This score is not currently being contested.

Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.

No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.

About M&G

M&G plc is a UK-based financial services and asset management firm founded in 1901, headquartered in London. It manages £375.9B in assets under management across equities, bonds, alternatives, and real estate. As an asset manager and asset owner, M&G's sustainability impact is dominated by financed emissions from its investment portfolios rather than direct operations.

Founded
1901
Headquarters
London, United Kingdom
Employees
~8,282
Annual revenue
~£4,425M
Company website ↗
Track M&G

We'll let you know when the score moves.

Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.

THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Nobody can pay us to change a number.