Robert Dyas sustainability score: 33/100

No published Scope 1 or Scope 2 emissions data. Only evidence is one avoided-emissions figure: 285 tonnes CO2 from a 3-month Facilio energy project across 93 stores in 2023. Estimated total footprint likely 5,000–20,000 tonnes, but unverified. No sustainability report published since 2022.

No Scope 3 emissions data published. Global supply chains of manufactured home goods, kitchenware, and hardware carry material upstream emissions risk. No supplier engagement programme, no supply chain emissions mapping, no Scope 3 assessment identified.

20% energy consumption reduction across 93-store estate via Facilio (2022–2023); prior 30% electricity reduction reported June 2022. No multi-year absolute emissions baseline or verified trend. Evidence third-party reported but covers only one year of directional reduction.

No renewable energy tariff, PPA, or on-site generation documented. Engagement with Facilio focused on energy efficiency monitoring (smart meters, IoT). LED rollout targeting 500,000 kWh saving. Efficiency investment evidenced; renewable sourcing absent.

In-store recycling schemes for BRITA filters (830,000+ since 2010), ZeroWater, batteries, ink, lightbulbs. No nature policy, deforestation commitment, or supply chain nature risk assessment. Global supply chains contain embedded upstream nature risk unaddressed.

In-store take-back schemes for BRITA, ZeroWater, batteries, cartridges, lightbulbs, SodaStream—partner-initiated product stewardship, not company-initiated circularity. No formal waste reporting, packaging policy, or operational diversion targets. Multi-year, multi-stream infrastructure present.

No water consumption, footprint, or discharge data published. Retail operations inherently low water impact. No evidence of pollution or discharge incidents. BRITA recycling has marginal indirect water benefit. Appropriate 'no data' rating for low-material-impact sector.

No SBTi commitment, net-zero target, or published emissions reduction targets. Energy work described in cost-saving terms (£600,000 savings, 20% energy cost reduction), not climate commitments. LED rollout is operational, not science-aligned. No formal pledge identified.

No sustainability report, ESG report, or TCFD/CSRD disclosure. No dedicated sustainability role publicly identified. CFO led energy efficiency programme—cost-driven, not formal climate governance. Smart meter tracking capability present but no public sustainability disclosure.

No greenwashing findings, regulatory fines, ASA rulings, environmental lawsuits, or NGO criticism found. No climate lobbying or opposition to climate policy identified. Clean record but no proactive climate advocacy or transparency disclosure.