Ann Summers has published no emissions data, no sustainability report, and no evidence of progress on climate targets since FY2020. The company claims SBTi alignment and renewable energy targets but discloses nothing measurable. Supply chain risks span extreme labour-abuse countries with zero biodiversity or chemical hazard assessment. Marketing sustainability while delivering opacity.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Resource Use & Waste (5/10, 3/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Transparency & Accountability (0/10, 1/10).
7 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 42 major retail (non-fashion) brands we've scored, Ann Summers sits 39th of 42.
Score history begins 5 April 2026.
As Ann Summers's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Ann Summers is a UK-based intimate apparel and adult wellness retailer operating ~80 physical stores, a distribution centre, and online channels. Founded in 1976, the company sources textiles, silicone, plastics, and electronics globally. Revenue was £93M in FY2024-25. It operates as a private limited company with limited public disclosure obligations.
Same company; baseline for comparison within intimate apparel and direct-sales retail sector.
View breakdown →Fast-fashion e-commerce with similar supply chain opacity and labour-risk exposure; comparable disclosure gaps.
View breakdown →Online retail peer facing similar pressure to disclose emissions and supply chain practices; better transparency.
View breakdown →Extreme case of minimal environmental disclosure and extreme labour risk; shows floor of retail accountability.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.