Carbon Footprint — Operations: How does KFC (Yum! Brands) score?

Yum! Brands reports Scope 1 and 2 emissions with third-party limited assurance from AICPA-standard accountants, covering company-owned restaurants, corporate offices, and transportation. The 2023 GRI Index reports 126 MT CO2e per restaurant for Scopes 1&2. The GHG Statement is verified annually and methodology follows the GHG Protocol. However, Yum! directly operates only ~2% of restaurants, meaning reported Scope 1&2 covers a small fraction of the physical footprint. Score reflects good disclos

Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain: How does KFC (Yum! Brands) score?

Yum! reports Scope 3 franchise restaurant energy emissions (152 MT CO2e per restaurant) and has identified major supply chain categories including poultry, beef, dairy, and packaging. KFC's Scope 3 is approximately 34 Mt CO2e, dominated by purchased goods and franchise operations. However, full value chain mapping is incomplete — the company needs more detail on methane from livestock and deforestation-linked supply chains. The Scope 3 target is intensity-based (per metric ton), not absolute, an

Emissions Trajectory: How does KFC (Yum! Brands) score?

Yum! achieved a 25% absolute reduction in Scope 1&2 for company-owned operations vs 2019 baseline (2024 data), and 29% in 2023 data. For franchise restaurants (Scope 3), a 28-30% per-restaurant reduction was achieved. However, the franchise Scope 3 target is intensity-based (per restaurant), not absolute — and with Yum! opening a new restaurant every 2 hours, total absolute Scope 3 emissions from franchises may be stable or rising despite per-unit improvements. The protein and packaging Scope 3

Energy Source: How does KFC (Yum! Brands) score?

Yum! moved US corporate offices to 100% renewable energy in 2020 and committed 1,000 US company-owned restaurants to Green-e certified RECs by 2022. Some on-site solar exists at KFC and Taco Bell locations globally, and Pizza Hut UK uses off-site renewables. However, 98% of restaurants are franchised and the renewable energy strategy for the vast franchise network is limited and relies heavily on voluntary adoption. Yum! is not an RE100 member. The Green-e RECs for US operations are unbundled ce

Nature & Biodiversity Impact: How does KFC (Yum! Brands) score?

Yum! has a zero deforestation palm oil policy since 2015 and KFC Europe committed to sourcing 100% sustainable soy by 2025. Close to 90% of beef is sourced from regions with lower deforestation risk. The company is updating governance for EUDR compliance. However, Yum! has a significant history of Greenpeace campaigns over rainforest-linked packaging (2006-2012) and Amazon soy concerns. The 2024 report touches on deforestation risks but lacks a detailed global roadmap. There is no TNFD-aligned d

Resource Use & Waste: How does KFC (Yum! Brands) score?

In 2024, Yum!'s system used approximately 515,000 metric tons of fiber-based and 120,000 metric tons of plastic-based consumer-facing packaging. The company has a harmonized cross-brand packaging policy, 25 plastic reduction projects, and committed to remove Styrofoam/EPS globally. Taco Bell expanded its recycling program with TerraCycle, and Habit Burger Grill reduced paper usage. A 50% food waste diversion target by 2030 exists via U.S. Food Loss and Waste Champions. However, quantification of

Water Impact: How does KFC (Yum! Brands) score?

Yum! reports to CDP Water Security and scored A- in 2024. Water withdrawals decreased ~3% in 2022 vs 2021 for company-owned restaurants. The company uses WRI Aqueduct for water stress assessment and has conservation measures including low-flow fixtures and drought-resistant landscaping. However, water data quantification within restaurants is challenged by data availability issues, and the 2024 report states that quantification of water-related metrics 'was not possible due to data challenges.'

Targets & Commitments: How does KFC (Yum! Brands) score?

Yum!'s near-term SBTi targets were approved in 2021: 46% absolute reduction in Scope 1&2 by 2030 (1.5°C aligned). However, Scope 3 targets are intensity-based (per restaurant, per metric ton of protein/packaging), not absolute — a significant weakness given rapid expansion. The SBTi identified Yum! as having its net-zero commitment removed in 2024. The company's net-zero 2050 ambition remains self-stated but lacks SBTi validation. The protein/packaging Scope 3 target shows only 1% progress as of

Transparency & Accountability: How does KFC (Yum! Brands) score?

Yum! publishes an annual Global Citizenship & Sustainability Report, reports in accordance with GRI Standards, participates in CDP Climate (A-) and CDP Water Security (A-), and completed its first CSRD double materiality assessment in 2024. The GHG Statement receives limited assurance from independent accountants (AICPA standards). Board-level oversight exists via the Nominating & Governance Committee, and a Chief Sustainability Officer reports to the CEO. Quarterly ESG updates are provided to t

Controversies & Red Flags: How does KFC (Yum! Brands) score?

Starting at 8. Deductions: (1) Greenpeace campaigns (2006-2012) over rainforest destruction in packaging supply chain and Amazon soy for chicken feed — these were significant and widely reported, though partially resolved with a 2015 palm oil policy (-1). (2) Undercover investigation (2021-2022) by VFC exposed misleading KFC UK animal welfare marketing — described as 'most disingenuous marketing campaign' — though not a regulatory ruling (-1). (3) KFC withdrew from the Better Chicken Commitment

KFC (Yum! Brands) Sustainability Score: 32/100

Recently scored: Dentsu, Omnicom, Publicis Groupe, WPP

507 companies scored·4 score updates this week

KFC (Yum! Brands)·Food Service / Restaurants·Louisville, United States·Founded 1930·Last verified 21 April 2026

out of 100

Below expectationsPending Review

KFC operates 61,000+ franchised restaurants with minimal direct control over emissions. Scope 1&2 reporting is verified but covers only 2% of physical footprint. Scope 3 targets are intensity-based, not absolute—masking rising total emissions despite per-unit gains. Withdrawn from animal welfare commitments and SBTi net-zero validation in 2024.

No challenges currently filed

The calculation

Every score shows its working.

Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale

Industry base impact

Food Service / Restaurants sector ceiling.

45 / 100

Performance score

Sum of the 10 rubric questions, scored 0–10 each.

46 / 100

Raw score

Weighted average before scale penalty.

(0.3 × 45) + (0.7 × 46) = 45.7

Scale penalty

Multiplier based on absolute emissions volume — physics-first.

× 0.7

Final score

Rounded. Below expectations.

32 / 100

The ten questions

Where KFC (Yum! Brands) is strong, and where it isn't.

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Transparency & Accountability (7/10, 6/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Targets & Commitments (3/10, 4/10).

Where the evidence comes from

Every document used, listed.

17 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.

[1]Public record

finnhub.io — news

Unknown

Q1Q9

Every score shows its working.

Where KFC (Yum! Brands) is strong, and where it isn't.

Every document used, listed.

Where KFC (Yum! Brands) sits among food service / restaurants peers.

KFC (Yum! Brands)'s score over time.

This score is not currently being contested.

Related companies worth a look.

We'll let you know when the score moves.

Which companies moved this week, and why.