Itsu operates 80+ restaurants and a grocery business with £176M revenue but publishes zero emissions data, has no climate targets, and discloses nothing on supply chain impact. Packaging waste reduction efforts are the only substantive sustainability work. The company is growing without any documented environmental strategy.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Resource Use & Waste (8/10, 4/10). Weakest on Transparency & Accountability and Targets & Commitments (1/10, 1/10).
8 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 46 major food service / restaurants brands we've scored, Itsu sits 36th of 46.
Score history begins 5 April 2026.
As Itsu's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Itsu is a UK-based Asian fast-casual restaurant and grocery chain founded in 1976, operating 80+ locations across the UK, France, and Amsterdam. The company serves noodles, sushi, and Asian-inspired dishes alongside a grocery product line, generating £175.9M annual revenue with approximately 1,200 employees.
Asian casual dining peer with similar scale and supply chain complexity; comparison on emissions disclosure and targets.
View breakdown →UK quick-service restaurant chain of comparable size; benchmark for sustainability reporting in food service.
View breakdown →UK food/beverage producer with transparency-first culture; contrast in sustainability communication maturity.
View breakdown →Food waste reduction specialist; comparison on circular economy and environmental action credibility versus incremental packaging changes.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.