The Ivy Collection sustainability score: 29/100

No annual emissions report, CDP submission, or Companies House GHG filing found. Sustainability policy commits to annual reporting and reduction targets but provides no data. Estimated operational footprint of 10,000–50,000 tonnes CO₂e annually across 50 sites with significant cooking, refrigeration, and HVAC loads remains entirely unreported.

Zero Scope 3 data or supply chain emissions assessment published. Policy references 'engaging suppliers on sustainability' and 'responsible meat and fish sourcing' but provides no methodology, verification, or quantification. Complex food supply chain (meat, fish, dairy, alcohol) across 50 restaurants likely represents tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of tonnes CO₂e, entirely undisclosed.

No historical emissions data available for any year. Company actively expanding site count beyond 50 locations and grew revenue from £200M (FY2022) to £327M (FY2025). No SBTi commitment. Expansion in absence of disclosed emissions data provides no basis to infer declining absolute emissions.

No renewable energy data, green tariff, RE100 membership, or power purchase agreement disclosed. Sustainability policy commits to 'promote use of renewable energy sources' but no evidence of action or percentage renewable found. Operates 50 restaurants with significant electricity loads across UK grid without documented renewable engagement.

Sustainability policy mentions 'responsible sourcing of meat and fish' and references an Animal Welfare Policy. No deforestation-free commitment, TNFD disclosure, FSC certification, or third-party verification found. Material exposure via beef and dairy supply chains linked to land use change remains unquantified and unverified.

Sustainability policy commits to waste hierarchy—prevention, reuse, recycling, and food waste minimization. No waste tonnage, food waste data, recycling rates, or circular targets published. No formal food waste monitoring programme or surplus food redistribution scheme identified across 50-site estate.

Policy states intention to adopt 'water efficiency measures', monitor usage, and protect water quality. No water consumption data, reduction targets, or verified efficiency measures published. No pollution incidents or non-compliance found. Monitoring commitment stated with no public evidence of actual monitoring or outcomes.

Policy commits to 'seek continual reductions in scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions aligned to industry standards' but sets no specific, measurable, time-bound targets. No SBTi commitment listed on target dashboard. No net-zero target, interim milestones, or science-aligned pathway established. Purely aspirational language with no numerical anchors.

Sustainability policy identifies Governance Committee and Sustainability Committee meeting quarterly, with manager/executive incentives for sustainable performance. Public policy document available. No annual impact report, third-party verification, TCFD or CSRD disclosure, or externally verified emissions data published. Governance structure exists in policy form only.

No environmental regulatory fines, greenwashing rulings (ASA, CMA, FTC), or credible NGO environmental criticism found. No climate policy lobbying or obstruction identified. Single controversy identified was labour-related (2023 service charge complaints), not environmental. No active environmental advocacy. Clean environmental record with minimal proactive disclosure.