Recently scored: Dentsu, Omnicom, Publicis Groupe, WPP
Wagamama·Food Service / Restaurants·London, UK·Founded 1992·Last verified 22 April 2026
44
out of 100
Below expectationsPending Review

Wagamama reports emissions under SECR rules and maps Scope 3 supply chain emissions via Normative, credible moves for a 160-site chain. But absolute emissions are rising with expansion, intensity improvements mask growth, and the net-zero 2040 target lacks SBTi validation. The farmed salmon controversy revealed reluctance to phase out high-impact ingredients.

The calculation

Every score shows its working.

Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale
Industry base impact
Food Service / Restaurants sector ceiling.
45 / 100
Performance score
Sum of the 10 rubric questions, scored 0–10 each.
47 / 100
Raw score
Weighted average before scale penalty.
(0.3 × 45) + (0.7 × 47) = 46.4
Scale penalty
Multiplier based on absolute emissions volume — physics-first.
× 0.95
Final score
Rounded. Below expectations.
44 / 100
The ten questions

Where Wagamama is strong, and where it isn't.

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain and Energy Source (6/10, 6/10). Weakest on Targets & Commitments and Emissions Trajectory (3/10, 3/10).

Where the evidence comes from

Every document used, listed.

9 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.

[1]Self-reported
Wagamama Annual Report FY2024
2024
Q1Q3Q9
View →
[2]Self-reported
The Restaurant Group FY2024 Annual Report
2024
Q1
View →
[3]Third-party verified
Normative: The Restaurant Group
Ongoing
Q2Q8
View →
[4]Third-party verified
Sustained: The Restaurant Group Supply Chain Emissions Collection
Unknown
Q2
View →
[5]Self-reported
TRG Environmental Policy 2024
2024
Q4Q6Q7Q8
View →
[6]Self-reported
The Restaurant Group: Environment Page
Ongoing
Q4Q7
View →
[7]Self-reported
Wagamama: Animal Welfare Policy
Ongoing
Q5
View →
[8]Public record
SeafoodSource: Activists Push Wagamama to Drop Farmed Salmon
Unknown
Q5Q10
View →
[9]Self-reported
Wagamama: Treading Softly Sustainability Page
Ongoing
Q6Q9
View →

If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.

Wagamama in context

Where Wagamama sits among food service / restaurants peers.

Among the 46 major food service / restaurants brands we've scored, Wagamama sits 9th of 46.

9/46
Wagamama's rank
34
Industry average
19
Industry low
50
Industry high
How this score has moved

Wagamama's score over time.

today

Score history begins 4 April 2026.

As Wagamama's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.

We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.

What's being contested

This score is not currently being contested.

Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.

No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.

About Wagamama

Wagamama is a UK-based Asian noodle and rice restaurant chain with ~160 UK sites, US operations, and Indian expansion. Founded in 1992, it operates across city centres, shopping centres, and airports. Parent company The Restaurant Group also owns Chop House and Brunning & Price. Mid-tier casual dining focused on plant-forward Asian cuisine.

Founded
1992
Headquarters
London, UK
Employees
~16,000
Annual revenue
~£560M
Company website ↗
Track Wagamama

We'll let you know when the score moves.

Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.

THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

HOW SINK STAYS INDEPENDENT

Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.